Editorial Digital Freedom
13 October 2007
is no doubt that Al Gore and the IPCC deserve the Nobel Peace Prize, for a long time ago that the award has specialized in empty gestures, pompous, hypocritical, no demonstrable relationship to peace.
Al Gore and the IPCC certainly deserved the Nobel Peace Prize. Not because they did nothing for peace, naturally. The same press release from the Norwegian committee responsible for granting is in huge trouble justification. The prize was awarded to them for "their efforts to create and disseminate greater knowledge about climate change due to man's hand, and place the foundations for the measures needed to counteract." From there to the peace, a long way, taking the Norwegians claiming that the weather could lead to large-scale migration and greater competition for resources, would increase the risk of violent conflict. Unprovable too conditional.
But despite this, no doubt deserved, for a long time ago that the award has specialized in empty gestures, pompous, hypocritical, no demonstrable relationship to peace. A bias that suffers from its beginnings as a shows that being awarded to Neville Chamberlain but not Winston Churchill. or never received the Rey Juan Carlos I, capable of leading a peaceful transition from dictatorship to democracy. Unfortunately, but that has been exacerbated over the years. The ideal candidates for the committee are not those who have actually done something for peace, but like-minded people with ideas that can adopt as their own. By that standard
complacent, Al Gore and the IPCC were perfect candidates. Its possible merits without any relation to peace, but the grant allows the committee members as people become highly concerned about the environment and in line with the obsessions of international liberals, which seems to be all that interested in a time now.
So, Al Gore and the IPCC will be in the perfect company Rigoberta Menchu, which was given the award for turning his life into a symbol of the struggle for indigenous people, a biography proved false from beginning to end, as many of the assertions in Al Gore, that central contradicting the IPCC or the UN organization itself, whose conclusions are cooked by politicians and not scientists, and which have been "removed" many eminent for its increasing politicization.
does not matter the deep hypocrisy of Al Gore, allowing you to have among its highly polluting mining properties or your household spends more electricity, that which urges us to save if you do not want to face the apocalypse "that the average American family of 20, nor the extra income arising from their cross, exemplified with nearly half a million euros to be pocketed by a pair of conferences on the Canaries. For more he tried, could not compete in this field, with winners such as Kofi Annan, head of the corrupt Oil for Food program and the father of Kojo.
However, despite being a concession perfectly consistent with the philosophy that usually these awards are granted, it should be noted that this award brings the Norwegian Nobel Committee for Peace in uncharted waters. From now on, may be granted to individuals and institutions that have contributed to peace and prevent conflicts that have never taken place and may never happen and whose efforts, in fact, may have nothing to do with the causes giving rise to these hypothetical wars. You have to tip my hat to such a waste of imagination.
Myths and Scams
0 comments:
Post a Comment