Just a study of Chinese scientists who predict a sharp cooling for the next 20 years (Zhen-Shan, L. and Xian, S, 2007), but this news hits the mainstream media: only global terror instilled by the latest report from the UN-IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel Climate Change) - presumably because the warming C02 punished flood our ears.
No one can prove that climate change due to anthropogenic effects. The UN is only based on guesswork and computer simulations, but that's not science, is a scientific simulation is politically tinged speculative money and beliefs.
TO BREATHE pollute more
climate change disinformation and manipulation of propaganda that gives the UN are ubiquitous. The annual human C02 is 6000 million tonnes, which is at 1,500 because half is absorbed by vegetation and oceans and the other half comes from farming and ranching. Breathing annually emit about 2,500 million tonnes and there are 750,000 million total in the atmosphere (Essex & MacKitrick, 2003), making it impossible for the human C02 can produce climate change.
The C02 and water vapor (the major greenhouse factor) act as plastic or glass in a greenhouse, trapping heat leaving the earth by solar radiation infrarroja.El greenhouse effect is good and natural, gives prosperity as Arrenhius said, its discoverer and confirmed Budyko, another authority.
The temperature rise in a century has been 0, 6, and only half is due to C02 according to the experts of the UN (IPCC report 2001). The only daytime maximums have increased 0.2 degrees in a century (Esterling et al, 1997). The current C02 is 380 ppm (parts per million), an amount that we had in the Carboniferous without Bush and nothing happened. In the Cambrian we had 7,000 ppm and at the time of the dinosaur-ments 3,000 and 6,000 ppm (Scotese, 2001, Berner 2001) and no contaminated or the average temperature then spent just 22 º C. In our breath we have 50,000 ppm and no one dies. In addition, the measured C02 preindustrial bad as Wagner and Van Hoff reported, so the actual increase is still lower than that stipulated: only 40-50 ppm.
say that with 540 ppm coming catastrophe, but that we share and the large industrial cities and still alive. 70,000 years ago there was an increase of 16 ° C in Greenland (Dansagaar-Oeschger event 19) and nothing happened and no contaminated. How can we ourselves have caused a disaster for only half a degree (0.3 º C real C02) and 18 cm rise in sea level?. This is Science Fiction. Kyoto only this rebate.
Dr. William Ruddiman, University of Virginia, said that the C02 is good because it slows down the ice and says that the current warming started thousands of years. The C02 does not increase the temperature, as evidenced in the C02 40-70 up and the temperature fell 0.3 ° due to solar cycles (Murray Mitchell Jr., 1976).
thousand years ago used to grow grapes in the south of England in the MWP called: there was a warm up before the mini ice age of the Maunder Minimum in 1650, which is what will happen now with the minimum Gleissberg of 2020 so the IPCC is not hysteria no scientific basis. This shows that the current warming is not the highest in recent centuries: a logic swing, cyclical and natural, which anticipates a cooling phase, the opposite of what we sell.
Sea level has risen only 18 cm in a century according to the UN (6 cm real as Wadhams & Munk, 2003) and the cataclysm that tell the models that will happen in 100 years-if true-up of 55 or 88 ridiculous centimeters, according to the IPCC. The UN asked suspiciously 200,000 million dollars annually to prevent the apocalypse.
The NERC English Institute which is lined with warming, calls dóalres 9 trillion. NERC from the Stern Review which proclaimed Blair, announcing a major disaster. But Nicholas Stern is interested source, a member of the UN, World Bank Vice President, in addition to the NERC has received 20 million pounds to save us from global warming.
Kyoto is a market that moves U.S. $ 200,000 million by 2012 and that Spain is going to cost 19,000 million euros, according to Price Waterhouse Coopers audit. We are less polluting and more NAMOS pay because of bad business that made Narbonne and Bacon. Behind the unprovable Kyoto scenario, not fine eg CO2 from cars, there are mainly money, business and politics because now science is politicized and scientists live on government grants and institutions.
BULO THE CONSENSUS: 18,000 SKEPTICS
Most of the world's scientists reject the hypothesis that the C02 has warmed the atmosphere, 18,000 reject the so-called Oregon Petition, 1997 (can be found here www.oism.org), pressure-loss by Frederick Seitz, a former member UN-IPCC there and former president of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, who quit the IPCC, as the hurricane expert Dr. Landsea, by the corruption he encountered there.
Kyoto also strongly rejected the call Leipzig Declaration, 1995 signed up to the famous scientist Sir Fred Hoyle, creator of two of the most famous theories on the origin of the uni-verse and life (panspermia), who announced together with his colleague Chandra Wikramasinghe astrophysicist world authority, that we are approaching an imminent glaciation (Campos, Calor Glacial, 2005). Dr. Victor
Bokova, the AARI (Institute of Arctic and Antarctic Research), the world's leading and only predicted the tsunami of Indian advertising, based on the Weather Index Vanghenheim-Girs we approach an age of ice would start in 2010 peaking in 2090. (Campos, 2005).
In 2006 Dr. Kabhibullo Abdusamatov, head of the Russian Space Station (Russian NASA) who rejects the thesis of Kyoto, says exactly the same: "At 9 or 6 years will start a mini ice age." Many solar scientists as Solanky or Soon and Baliunas, Harvard University, make identical forecasts. Theodor
Landscheidt, the only hit with the arrival of El Niño, also warned in the 90 on a mini-ice age, as we approach the minimum Gleissberg 2030. Hence comes the cold waves that sweep across the world for three years. According to Suess solar cycle of 180 years, also plays cooling, since the Dalton minimum period of the nineteenth century has been exhausted. But the IPCC always ninguneo solar cycles.
Scientists predict a cooling and at the same time criticize Kyoto are legion, heads-two Fred Singer, John MacKitrik, Steven MacIntyre, Frederick Seitz and Richard Lindzen, the most eminent meteorological go U.S.. Dr. Zbigniew Jaworoski, former chairman of UNSCEAR, United Nations Scientific Committee for the Effects of Atomic Radiation, says "Western civilization will be swept away by ice" (Campos, 2005).
Hundreds of experts from around the world consider the danger of glaciation scenario as Robert Essenhigh, the Oregon State University, who says he will arrive in 5 or 50 years, Robert Gagosian and William Curry of the world's leading oceanographic institute (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution), the Pentagon report in 2004, experts in the Gulf Stream and Bryden, Wadhams and Marotzke, English officials as Millán Millán and dancing ("The Day After Tomorrow could happen," he said), Peter Clark , Howard Conway, Gerald Dickens, Gerard Bond, John Gribbin, Laurence Hecht, Jack Sauers etc ...
say that the incompetent Bush or Exxon-Mobil paid to these scientists. but where is the campaign of those authors whom the media completely silent? Calentólogos say and members of the IPCC, as Piltz and Pielke, who studies censure Bush, but is just the opposite: the IPCC who ruthlessly purges all dissent. Dr. Roy Spencer and many others criticize the IPCC Science and censor their studies anticalentamiento. (Bethell, 2006)
FUNDAMENTALISM MATHEMATICAL
Experts from the UN-IPCC are only 2,500 and all models, ie only based on computerized simulations made by computer to 100 years to scare or counterfeit graphics as the famous hockey stick of Mann and Bradley (members of the IPCC), where they removed me-dieval warming for the current look older. Nature had to ask pardon in 2004 by this chicanery. Most of the authors of the IPCC are bureaucrats and scientists, as Pachauri Qin lords organization, and all scientists in solar cycles and paleoclimate are censored, as all mentioned in this article.
The creator of the IPCC was Bert R. Bolin, a fan of computer simulations that made his career by speculating on human action on climate change, based on studies of Roger Revelle, the Guru of Al Gore, a paranoid obsessed with the danger of C02, which is even highly beneficial, because helps the growth of plants (Maier-Reimar, Hesselman, Climate Dynamics, 1987)
why Dr. Michael Crichton warns that carbon fundamentalism and mathematical State of Fear (2005) that would put a stamp on warming computer models as snuff packages such as:
- "SIMULATION BY COMPUTER, COULD BE WRONG AND NOT ACCOMPLISHED"
specialists solar cycles are those who say that an ice age or cooling comes they have no place in the UN: Soon, Baliunas, Landscheidt, Jawarowski, Lindzen, Michaels, etc. .. or most Abdusamatov Russians, Kondratyev, Bokova Masnich, Bashkirtesev ... The Russian Academy of Sciences has rejected the thesis of the UN, because temperatures as -40 º last year etc. .. do not argue.
That consensus that there is a canard: so there is the same politicized corruption reports made by the UN on Iraq's weapons (Bethell, 2006). Turned out it was all a lie. Now is the same. The press draws on false and manipulated reports of the UN and get the feeling that there is consensus. Is that if only half a degree warming in a century is said to be natural, no more funds and the business of Kyoto where to buy and sell the C02 in a grotesque market of 200,000 million dollars until 2012. Reports of AIDS from UNAIDS are also exaggerated and manipulated. The corruption of the UN has been denounced by Eric Frattini in a book titled.
THE LIES OF POLES AND GLACIERS
So what is said there are a legion of scientists agree is absolutely false. There is a war between multinational renewable energy (which are the oil companies: they are not "hippies": British Petroleum, Shell, Sharp, Siemens, Acciona, Enron etc ...) and gas against those of cheap coal to gain market pie. That is the origin of the phobia against C02 coal and electricity. The conferences of Al Gore, for example, pays action to promote renewable energy-solar wind. (See http://www.todosolar.com). Greenpeace is a shareholder in Shell.
Contrary to the daily crush us, Antarctica and Greenland is cold in general (Doran, 2002, Johanessen, 2005) although there are parts that are thawed by natural causes and most gla-stable Ciara (Braithwaite , 2002) or grow, as the largest (Lambert, Logan, Naruse ...). Remember that the last two glaciations were produced by melting of the Arctic, which cut the Gulf Stream, which warms the Northern Hemisphere.
The Aletsch Alpine retracted and in the nineteenth century and thaws Kilimanjaro to deforestation (Khas et al, 2004). West Himalayan glaciers are increasing, according Fowland (2006), who blames everything on the heating in a report commissioned and paid by the IPCC, which is a member, an example of the reports and conclusions of the UN, in which no informed person should believe.
English journalist,
Author of book: Heat glacial
Source: www.mitosyfraudes.org
Posted by: Carlos A.
Ortiz Former Professor - Researcher
Faculty of Economics, U.Na.M, is
0 comments:
Post a Comment