Thursday, February 15, 2007

Cramps 4 Days Before Period

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Asprey, Robert B. "The Germ HIGH COMMAND IN WAR. Hindenburg, Ludendorff AND THE FIRST WORLD WAR" NEW YORK 1991

BRUNET, JP "A WAR TO ANOTHER 1914-1945" MADRID 1991

DE LA SIERRA LUIS "THE SEA IN THE GREAT WAR" BARCELONA 1984

GILBERT, MARTIN "THE FIRST WORLD WAR" MADRID 2004


KINDER, H.-HILGEMANN, W. "HISTORICAL ATLAS WORLD II" MADRID 1996

Mommsen, WJ "the era of imperialism" MADRID 1971

Tuchman, BARBARA "The Guns of August"
BARCELONA 2004
ROSENBERG, ALFRED "THE MYTH OF THE CENTURY" SPAIN 2006

VV.AA. (Madridejos, M.) "THE TWENTIETH CENTURY. The great deeds" SPAIN 1988

STONE, NORMAN "TRANSFORM EUROPE 1878-1919" MADRID 1985

STURM, MICHAEL "The German Empire" (1870-1919) BARCELONA 2003

Valluy, JF "WORLD WAR, VOLUME I 1914-1916" SPAIN 1976

VV.AA. (LABO, JM) "EUROPE ARMED PEACE" MADRID 1997

Westwell, I. "THE FIRST WORLD WAR DAY BY DAY" MADRID 2002









Tuesday, February 6, 2007

Where Is Good To Masterbate Too

VII. ATTITUDES OF THE GOVERNMENTS AND PEOPLES

"Austria-Hungary thought ... France is reset, Serbia refuses ... " under these phrases are sometimes concealed the complexities of the internal life of nations, with a simplified terms nominalism. It's more accurate to say "the Austrian government thought ... the French government decided to reset" ... conditions, that if, for the internal power balance . It should make the reader reflect on this important point, all governments, including always theoretically autocratic systems are influenced or directed by their respective publics and in the period of mass society that is consolidated in the XIX-XX centuries, the multiplication of the popular press and sensationalist insight into the collective mind, the appearance of new methods and ways of communicating and relating, in short, opinion-forming strengthen the concept of "public ." Remember that usually segmented, and segments are more or less able to influence the government to form pressure groups.

PHOTO. DEMONSTRATION OF RETIREES IN MUNICH TO PLEAD THE WAR. IN THE CIRCLE, a 25-year-old Adolf Hitler in the crowd.



In July 1914 there was a political strife within each European country before the crisis, patriotic enthusiasm spilled over into early August with the declarations of war. The vast majority of political parties and public closed ranks around their governments and abundant street demonstrations supporting government decisions. Prevailed rooted moral effect of fear, hatred and accusations against the other side, imposing nationalism. In parliament this consensus around the national cause was the name of "Sacred Union " or "Burgfrieden" with the approval of large budgets for military equipment, temporary waiving strikes, decrease of civilian control over military decisions, etc.

In previous years statesmen rather pacifists in general (many were wary of the domestic consequences of a serious conflict) were drawn as to the obstacles faced in international politics that quickly filtered to the internal debate . Normally, the output was the arms race, which became an irreversible trend, a growing effort to increase the margin of superiority or not to be overcome. The temptation to use the formidable armed forces as a pressure tool advantageous to any dispute between countries was irresistible, agreeing to get to the end if necessary. It was a fatalistic mentality, epitomized in the phrase of Poincare: "We do not want war, but fear not ." We have seen the presence of this philosophy in the crisis that followed the assassination in Sarajevo. The concept of "preventive war" was handled with ease in the Staffs of the armies, and ultimately war was considered according to the terms of Clausewitz: "continuation of politics by other means"

In addition, there existed cultural versions of the war described as purifying process and rise above small meanness and mediocrity of daily life, a heroic sacrifice for the survival of the national body, the only truly immortal and that debian individuals devotion. The prestige of the martial, the worship of force as an engine of change concepts were inserted by the national education systems. Even further, the war was interpreted as a natural phenomenon or conscious choice of legitimate violence, a "higher form of existence " in the words of Nietzsche, war become an end in itself ... von Bernhardi explained, in a work of 1911: "war (...) is a biological need, is to implement the natural law based on which all other laws of nature, the struggle for existence "

One of the writers Pan-Germans of the late nineteenth century, Paul de Lagarde, in his" Deutsche Schriften "castigated what he considered too acomoditicía attitude of the bourgeoisie and the political life of Germanic and preached his solution, a crude nationalism as a factor of catharsis : "There has never been even a German state (...) The current status is a caste politics is a farce, public opinion (...) a cowardly whore live in the midst of civil war, which only temporarily takes its course without gunpowder and lead, but instead, with the most vile by the silence and slander ( ...) the belief in immortality becomes for us more and more indispensable condition under which we can only cope with life in the Jewish-German Reich composed of mud and iron (...) Nations does not arise from generation physical, but historical events, but are subject to the action of Providence. Nations why they are of divine institution, they are created (...) permanently recognize the mission of their nation means dip in the fountain that gives eternal youth: always serve this mission means for acquiring them higher and higher life. "

One of the theorists of Nazism, Alfred Rosenberg, wrote in 1934 referring to the time of uncertainty and transformations: " For the nineteenth century there is even a mitigating circumstance: that his humans were in the midst a swift current of industrialism was born, and like many others were also taken by surprise by the new. Felt, by the way, shake old values, but who would condemn them if they saw no dawn, but that died? "

Balllet Shoe Cake Mould

VI. THE FINAL CRISIS. THE ROAD TO WAR

PICTURE. REUNION of Austrian Emperor Franz JOSE (LEFT) WITH GERMAN OFFICERS. (EL KAISER WILLIAM II, third from right)



The news of the crime of Sarajevo not seem to disturb too much the pleasant early summer of 1914, the Kaiser Wilhelm II went to the races Kiel (even hurt, because knew the deceased personally Franz Ferdinand) in Paris celebrating the Grand Prix had and preparations for the day from the nearby national holiday, while President Poincare sailing to St. Petersburg a scheduled visit time ago ... there was nothing to foreshadow that was not just another of Chapters of the mess of Balkans proppiciado otherwise annoying for people in a turbulent corner of the continent, and nothing else.

There were two exceptions: Austria and Servia , the parties involved in the assassination . governments Vienna and Belgrade were handed over to a frantic diplomatic activity, considering decisions to take. In Austria-Hungary with the idea to harness the outrage at the attempt to make a final warning to Servia it would be both a stroke of authority within the empire who knows, inhibition could put threatening the very existence of Austria-Hungary ! position defended ardently by the Chief of Staff Hotzendorf and Berchtold, Austrian Foreign Minister since 1912. Before taking a major step proceeded to consult with the German government in early July, through Szösgyeny Ambassador, accredited Berlin. A letter from the old Emperor Francis Joseph summarizes the official position of the Viennese cabinet: "peace can not be certain until Servia (...) shall not perish from the Balkans power factor (.. .) peace policy pursued by all the monarchs of Europe be compromised while shaking the core of criminal go unpunished ".

These ideas were welcomed by Berlin , especially William II. On July 5th the Austrian embassy was Germany's answer: " anyway, the hostile attitude of Russia will be if the war (...) erupts between her and Austria-Hungary can be confident in Vienna that Germany remain a loyal ally is by side monarchy. On the other hand Russia is far from being ready for war (...) unfortunate that Austria would not draw match at this very favorable for her "this statement positively welcomed the nuts to Servia, perhaps including a localized war in the Balkans , he claimed to Austria military support if complications arose with Russia, but immediately afterwards was considered this possibility unlikely. Personally, I disagree with the part of the historiography it called a "blank check" to Austria this document. The words of this statement clearly focuses the problem in Serbia , not the undesirable idea of \u200b\u200ba general war. It is true that the mortgaged German foreign policy decisions to be taken in Vienna on how to proceed against Servia , an example of how a weaker ally can drag to a stronger partner than just tries to make a gesture "look good." This scenario shows the carelessness of the officials, who kept their vacation plans but still contact by telegraph attentive to the developments.

On July 7, after consultations with Berlin met a small council of ministers formed by Sturgkh , Berchtold and Tisza (prime minister of the Hungarian kingdom ), V on Krabotin (minister of war), Hotzendorf and the head of the Admiralty. From the discussions it was concluded the need for maximum strength and military action should take place if not accepted all the conditions Austro-Hungarian . Tisza was the most indecisive to adhere to these views, because I thought that whatever the outcome of a possible war would prejudice the Hungarian . Following further consultations with the German ambassador, Tschirschky . The
Wilhelmstraße
(German Foreign Ministry) by the Minister Jargow began making efforts to "localize" the war against Serbia with warnings to other capitals, partly to seek their answers. The 18 days the Austrian government had prepared its ultimatum to Servia . French President Poincaré, who continued his visit in St. Petersburg said: " Servia has very loyal friends in Russia. And Russia is an ally, France ... " although this belligerence was not shared at that time by the relaxed French opinion, not yet a national holiday and domestic scandals aired in the courts and newspapers . On 23

the Austrian ambassador in Belgrade , Giesl handed final text of the ultimatum Serbian government :

" from the statements and confessions of the perpetrators criminals in the June 28 attack follows the murder of Sarajevo has been hatched in Belgrade, that weapons and explosives of the murderers were delivered by officers and officials Serbs as part of the Narodna (...) Odbrana Serbian government should :

1 º Delete any publication that encourages hatred and contempt for the monarchy Austro-Hungarian and whose general trend goes against the integrity of Empire.
2 nd immediately dissolve the society called Narodna Odbrana
3 º Delete (...) without delay of public instruction in Servia (...) everything that serves or may serve to foster the propaganda against Austria-Hungary . 4 º Zoom
military service and (...) administration officials guilty of propaganda against the monarchy Austro-Hungarian . 5 º OK
within Serbia collaboration of the organs of imperial and royal government in the suppression of the subversive movement directed against the territorial integrity of the Empire. 6th
Open a judicial inquiry against the accomplices of the conspiracy on June 28 found in Serbian territory . The imperial government take part in these investigations by the relevant delegated bodies.
7 º urgently to arrest the commander Voija Tancosevic (...) committed by the results of the Sarajevo . (...)
8 º Prevent illegal trafficking of weapons and explosives through (...) border
9 th to explain the imperial government on the unwarranted statements Serbian officials to (...) expressed in a hostile manner towards Austro-Hungarian monarchy .
10 º (...) To report without delay the measures included in the above.
Imperial and Royal Government awaits the response (...) what later Saturday June 25 at 18.00 "


was a note extremely hard, especially with regard to intervention Austrian administration in Serbia . The implications of this ultimatum not go unnoticed, and began the return cylinder (of Poincare to France from Russia, William II to Berlin).

Was the German government as the final wording of the ultimatum ? At least there a division of opinion within it, but overall the idea of \u200b\u200bsupporting the government and outside Vienna in their claims.
In Russia, the reaction was not wait and began to take a decisive character, in a hurried council of ministers meeting of the foreign minister Sazonov said: "It is clear that the Austrian domination Servia is so intolerable for Russia as it would be the domination of the P bass AISES Germany for England. In fact it is a matter of life or death for Russia . That conference also gave in favor of a preventive Russian mobilization. Surely, this is the turning point of a serious crisis, but local to a conflict terrrible powers is precisely the difference in the mass mobilization of a party that makes irreversible the process of war.

Meanwhile, discussions continued in Belgrade , chaired by the radical liberal Pasic, frowned upon by ultranationalist Serbian , about the response to give the ultimatum . France and Britain pressed for a conciliatory gesture Serbian that would save face for Austrians outraged and furious. But in Belgrade beginning to see the deepening of the crisis as desirable and proceeded to mobilize and gold output in the state and royal family of the capital ... but otherwise communicated the acceptance of most of ultimatum except items 5 and 6 as a diplomatic tactic pretending so yield to the wishes of the Western allies, knowing that the Austrians would accept probably not this output. (An ultimatum requires, by its own terms , full acceptance to be canceled)

The 25 days ago the Austrian ambassador prepared to leave your bags Belgrade and Vienna agreed to the partial mobilization against Serbia . arose then the first concern expressed that the Balkan crisis is spread through the rest of Europe. The British foreign minister, Grey , requested an extension of the ultimatum and intervene with Austria and Russia. There was poor communication of this offer by Jargow Berchtold and Germany government.


On July 26 the offer was repeated, centered this time in convening a conference of ambassadors in unwelcome Vienna and Berlin who interpreted it as a delaying tactic, not enough to resolve a dispute of this size. On 27 Grey requested a German pressure on Austria to accept the answer that served that further discussions would be materialized in order to satisfy the demands of Austria.

The same day, an exultant Guillermo II said: "All grounds for war disappears. Austria achieved a great diplomatic success. The Austrian troops should occupy Belgrade as a pledge of the accepted conditions. Reservations on the points in detail shall be settled by negotiations . A demonstration of how the German government had raised the whole issue as a matter of prestige, a mere pulse diplomat who had to play hard to win a victory political, of course, this was far from a preconceived plan to build a world war, which belies many of the charges subsequently discharged by the victors and the pro-Allied historians reported.

However, some circles German government transmitted so late and incomplete assessment of the top leadership Germanic Austria. Here the mood was elated and would no longer than strict compliance with the ultimatum . On 28 Austria declared war on Servia . The next day began the bombing of Belgrade by two river gunboats stationed on the Danube .


was approaching the point of no return, with the rapid acceleration of events and facts, while diplomatic statements were becoming mere rhetoric. was rife the international alarm. The most far-reaching action, as a hostile act from one of the major powers was Russian partial mobilization declared on 29 July. The tremendous impact of this fact can not be underestimated when taking stock of the tense days in July 1914. Preparations to Russian, the German military, alarmed, they realized that a delay would give their own mobilization to tear up its strategic plan, the Schlieffen plan anticipate based on the Russians.


Amid the uncertainty of Guillermo II and Bethmann - Hollweg piled pressure on both and the last exchange of letters between the Tsar and the Kaiser not pass a series of gestures proactive but irrelevant. The 29 season was the British mediation offer, giving as good temporary occupation of Belgrade , but would not explain how London to appease the Russians; Sazonov rejected this offer if not previously stopped the Austro- served. An example of how the facts changed the previous situation and adding new demands and challenges mediation attempts.

PHOTO. GERMAN CHANCELLOR Bethmann - Hollweg




On the night of 29 to 30 appear to Hollweg took inevitability of a general war. Informed the Austrian part of the scruples and doubts Guillermo II but pressure them to cancel its war with Servia . On day 30 the total mobilization of the Russians was proclaimed amid enthusiasm of the country, ended recent misgivings and hesitations Berlin. If the Russians were advancing Germany could be written off ... it was necessary to act, "the stone has been thrown to roll and there is no stopping her," said Hollweg. The German generals led by Moltke and the War Minister E. Von Falkenhayn had the green light now and civil government was subordinated to their needs.



After receiving guarantee that Germany was preparing to mobilize, Austria-Hungary proclaimed their mobilization general on the night of 30 to 31. Some anti-war movements and socialist leaders meeting in Brussels were mere gesture without content.

the August 31, Germany sent an ultimatum St. Petersburg demanding the withdrawal of Russian mobilization described as hostile act. Having received no reply within the stipulated period, the German ambassador left the Russian capital Portales. On August 1 Germany declared mobilization and declared war on Russia.



Meanwhile, the French rejected the German summons to proclaim neutrality and provide the border towns of Toul and Verdun as guarantee to a Russian-German. The French responded by declaring their mobilization on August 1 while increased their requests for England to be incorporated permanently to the Entente . As was saying Ambassador in London, Cambon : "German fleet can enter the Channel and attack our coastlines defense? The people French to English say: you have betrayed us! "


Sample improvisation prevailing between the classes is the leaders who lived maremagnun the German High Command on Aug. 1, when William II , ill-informed about an alleged British guarantee the neutrality of France launched a counter to move the main army eastward against Russia, in the belief that maintain neutrality and English. Moltke was shocked, because to implement this occurrence would have meant breaking change all expectations and complex preparations for years and putting the fate of Germany in suspense, taking advantage of the unpredictable future attitude to take English and more than French predictable attack in Alsace-Lorraine . He barely managed to convince the Kaiser of impossibility and the inappropriateness of such a measure. addition, on the night of 1 to 2 was clarified that the only English words related the simultaneous maintenance of peace with France and Russia. Guillermo II told motka " Now you can act in their own way. Marche on Luxembourg "


On August 2, the first German soldiers went into Luxembourg, the Germany Ambassador in Brussels, the Belgian government gave a ultimatum demanding free passage of German troops. Was dismissed that night. Throughout the day, August 2 skirmishes were reported or hostile movements along the border between France and Germany. In Russia continued street demonstrations in support of war against Germany and Austria and for the Tsar. On August 3, claiming a violation of airspace by aircraft French German Germany declared war on France. In the early hours of 4, in compliance with the plan Schlieffen, German troops invaded Belgium.




PHOTO. ENTHUSIASM PATRIOTIC : FAREWELL TO FRENCH SOLDIERS.





decant This event ended up in Britain with the Franco- . London could not tolerate the control of Flanders, Belgium and Germany had the magnificent grounds of the act of 1839 (in which Britain guaranteed the neutrality of then newly created state Belgium) to silence those opposed to the opening of hostilities. The government of HH Asquith received unanimous support but a handful of isolated Labour. The English ultimatum demanding the withdrawal German Belgium expired at 2400 hours on 4 August.


The German view is summarized in the statement that the Chancellor Bethmann-Hollweg went to the Reichstag at the time:

"For 44 years we lived in peace. We just drawn his sword in defense of a just cause. Russia has lit the torch in the house (big applause). It would be a crime to wait until these powers, among which are constrained, to overflow. France has violated the peace. The French aircraft have crossed and hurled bombs. French cavalry patrols and infantry companies have entered Alsace. We have to act in self defense. Our troops have occupied Luxemburg and perhaps are already in Belgium (big shock).

Our invasion of Belgium violates international law, but we will repair the injustice that we have been forced to commit because of other (big applause) ... We will stand shoulder to shoulder with Austria-Hungary. We have told the England attack Belgian sovereignty but not independence. The time trial from Germany has arrived. Our army is in the field. Our army is ready for battle. Behind them remain a united people. "

A bellicose and exalted post, however, did not disguise the unease with the increasingly clear prospect of British intervention. Indeed, the night of August 4-5 held a stormy meeting between the British ambassador in Berlin, E. Goschen and Chancellor Bethmann-Hollweg. suvizar latter treatment the character of German intervention in Belgium but the British diplomat, sharply following the orders of his government, dismissed Ambassy: Belgium withdrawal or war.

German leaders would not understand, or suspected duplicity behind This British firm demand, as it implied the next outburst of Bethmann-Hollweg: "Britain is doing something unimaginable to a sister nation which desires only to live in peace with the English and everything (...) by a piece of paper! ", or suspected (quite rightly) as in the case of the Kaiser and other politicians, that England just joined Germany's enemies by mere rivalry.


On the morning of August 5, all the great nations of Europe, the Allies (France, Britain and Russia, Belgium and Serbia) and the Central Powers (Germany and Austria-Hungary) were involved as soon be called "Great War" or "World War."

PHOTO. MASS RALLY IN SAINT PETERSBURG FOR THE CENTRAL EMPIRES WAR IN AUGUST OF 1914




















Herpes Spread To Stomach Area

V. ASSASSINATION IN SARAJEVO: JUNE 28, 1914. Franz Ferdinand and Gavrilo Princip. IV.LAS
















PHOTO. Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife.

Within a dynastic rule was Austria-Hungary, the Habsburg succession was a key element of the state, affecting the major decisions, due to the weight of imperial authority over the government, in a estrutura semiautocrática. Since the suicide of Prince Rudolph, only son of Emperor Franz Joseph, in Mayerling in 1889 had taken his place Franz Ferdinand, Archduke of Austria, nephew of the emperor. Born in Graz in 1863, showed his particular vision of marrying in 1900 things Chotek Sofia, Czech noble, what he faced the Court. His children were excluded from the succession.

proeslava That sympathy was beyond the personal sphere, Franz Ferdinand had become a spokesman for the faction that advocated changing the dual monarchy system based on the hegemony of the Germanic kingdom, Austria, and the kingdom Magyar , Hungary, in a trilateral, at first in favor of the Czechs of Bohemia-Moravia and perhaps later extended to the Slavs under the control of Hungary (Franz Ferdinand himself was contrary to the positions of the aristocracy Hungarian as well as being ill-assorted with the liberal-radical and Austrian Socialists, especially with the Jews in Vienna. )

In short, closer to the liberal conservative, respectful of the principles of nationalities but not break the power of the Habsburgs preserving the territorial integrity of the empire. It is logical to him garner support and hostility alike. And in particular earned him the hostility of the ultranationalist Serbian operating inside and outside of Austria-Hungary advocating the creation of a "Greater Serbia" or some sort of union of South Slavs (Yugoslavia) under Serbian hegemony. An accommodation of the Slavs in Austria-Hungary they seemed misleading and Franz Ferdinand as future ruler of the hated Austria, simply abhorrent. The Archduke thus became a potential target for terrorists Serbs.

Having overcome the vagaries of 1912-13, in the early summer of 1914 there was no evidence that heralded the imminence of a general war. Even external symptoms indicated an appeasement. Germany and Britain had cooperated as a firebreak during the Balkan wars and now proceeded to rebuild their relationships. There were rumors of treatment intended to satisfy the German colonial claims to the detriment of the fragile Portugal, whose position in Angola and Mozambique depended largely on the tolerance of the British.

In these circumstances Francisco Fernado visited Bosnia to watch military maneuvers. completed this June 27, the program included ceremonial as the representative of the highest court imperial tour the regional capital, Sarajevo. It contained a mixed population of Slavic Muslims, Serbs and Croats, and was one of the centers of ultra-nationalism effervescence panservio (at least in the majority districts served ...)

display The authority announced Imperial did not go unnoticed and several terrorist factions got to work preparing a plot to assassinate the Archduke, was 7 the conspirators responsible for realizing the attack, including a young man of 20-year-old Bosnian Serb Gavrilo Princip.

On the morning of June 28, Franz Ferdinand dressed in full uniform and accompanied by his wife went to the city of Sarajevo for a reception with local authorities. They traveled in a motorcade of 3 cars found, making brief stops at the post office. Following the bed of the river Miljacka, the first attempt occurred when one terrorist, Cabrinovic, dropped a bomb that exploded under the car of Colonel Merizzi, a member of entourage was wounded along with another passenger. However, the visit continued with a tense town hall meeting in the middle of the harsh criticisms of Franz Ferdinand the nervous welcoming speech: "Stop, Mr. Mayor How it is possible to come here as a visitor friendly and welcome me with bombs ? What are you talking about my loyalty? ".

At the exit, still accompanied by his wife decided against the advice of Franz Ferdinand himself, went to the hospital to inquire about the wounded in the attack earlier. At the confluence of streets and Francisco Jose Rodolfo, lowering the car its running to rectify a wrong turn a young approached the vehicle of the Archduke and fired a gun several times at close range; the archduke was shot in the neck and his wife in the stomach, taken to the government palace died on the way, apparently without ever regaining consciousness. PHOTO
. ARREST OF MAIN (SECOND FROM RIGHT)
The murderer, Gavrilo Princip, was captured immediately by the crowd and the (limited) security officers. He was also previously arrested the bomber failed, Cabrinovic, a printer employed Bosnian Serb in Belgrade. Attached to other arrests, everything pointed to a conspiracy of Serb ultra-nationalists, but their ramifications and the degree of involvement of Serbian authorities was unknown. Antiservios riots soon began in Sarajevo and other Bosnian cities, fueled by the Croats, under the Austrian governor's silence (and responsible for the weak security of Franz Ferdinand), Potiorek.




PHOTO. The Ancient Emperor Franz Joseph



Immediate reactions were mixed: A stream of world opinion showed their condolences and condemned the crime. Resignation and a certain conformity of Emperor Franz Joseph (poorly related to his heir) undisguised joy of Serbian nationalists and opponents Archduke within the empire (remember the joy of some Hungarian officers at the news, described in J. Roth's novel "The March Radenzky).

Saturday, February 3, 2007

How Much Plan B Walmart Toronto

CRISIS IN THE BALKANS 1908-1913

Orthodox Slavic nationalism undermined the structure of the Turkish Empire in Europe in a long process initiated in 1832 to Greek independence, and accelerated in the last third of the nineteenth century, when after the Berlin Congress 1878 Romania, Serbia and Montenegro reach full independence. In October 1908, taking advantage of disputes within the Turkish government (when the Turkish army officers Macedonia impose the Sultan Abdul Hamid II, the nationalist movement and "modernizing" of the "Young Turks") Austria formally annexed Bosnia, and Bulgaria is governed by the Tsar Ferdinand I proclaimed his full unification with the principality of Eastern Rumelia, and rejected the servitude that provided so far to the Turkish Empire.


In 1907 he proposed a project to build a railroad Austrian to the important port of Thessaloniki (entoces even Turkish), this railway, in the image of many other built in Africa and Asia, was conceived as a tool economic penetration and colonial policy. Besides controlling the production of the Western Balkans to dominate the main means of transport, would serve to Servia isolating the Mediterranean Sea and prevent its expansion into the Turkish provinces of Novi Pazar and Albania.

This ambitious plan was suspended by the Austrians in September 1908 when its foreign minister L. von Aehrenthal appease the Russians preferred to evacuate the Austrian garrisons in Novi Pazar present to get their acquiescence formal annexation of Bosnia (Austrian protectorate since 1878 but considered Turkish province), a terrible blow to pan-claims Serbian. Acquiescence soon envisioned as a miscalculation by the Russian foreign minister Isvolski, exasperated as his proteges in Belgrade, the Russian government was quick to recant but found the fait accompli of the annexation in October 1908. Russian displeasure increased checking his own military impotence pressure due to the weakness of its armed forces and French inhibition not see themselves with military force to crash at that time with Germany, which pushed directly to Russia to give his assent to the Austrian annexation of Bosnia. Russia and Serbia had to resign, but his hostility against Austria and Germany increased at its peak. Tsar Nicholas II himself stated publicly: " Get ready because in the future will be inevitable confrontation with the Germans ." The other major perderdor Turkey was impotent at whose expense it calmed the tensions of other nations.


Turkish vulnerability was exposed again despite the efforts of the new cabinet in Istanbul to search for sponsorship German German Chancellor B. von Bülow fund must strive to reconcile their alliance "Nibelung" with Austria and territorial integrity of the Ottoman Empire during the Bosnian crisis. The final evacuation of Novi Pazar to Austria in June 1909 seemed to calm the waters of time. PHOTO . B. Von Bulow, GERMAN CHANCELLOR 1900 to 1909.

remained During 1910 a quiet atmosphere in international relations, apparently, because he kept the rearmament of France and Russia, the Duma adopted pro-tsarist large budgets for those years strengthening its military device ("Great Plan"), to the point The German strategists calculated that if this plan came to finish the course of a slow Russian mobilization would have been transformed in 1917 into an immediate mobilization ...

new disturbances appeared in 1911; second Moroccan crisis between Berlin and Paris after the Agadir incident was resolved with the French protectorate in Morocco everything (except the northern Rif under control English) and a border rectification in central Africa for the German colony of Cameroon after some difficult deals made by the French Prime Minister Caillaux. Unwelcome in France, these agreements undermined the position of Caillaux and strengthened the warmongers in the next election. PHOTO . J. Caillaux, CARE INSTRUCTIONS PRESIDENT OF THE FRENCH.




partly inspired by the extension of French power in North Africa, the Italians in September 1911 decided to expand his small empire occupying colonial Tripoli and Cyrenaica (Libya) both theoretical provinces Turkish Empire Ottoman action had the consent of the other powers (Germany, again with the dilemma of not offending two possible allies, and the indifference of France and England) First Turkish opposition Italians extended their operations to the European part of the seizing Dodecanese archipelago in the Aegean in May 1912. PHOTO . Italian troops landed during the Dodecanese OCCUPATION.




Meanwhile, in the spring of 1912, Bulgaria and Serbia, encouraged by Russian diplomacy agreed to work together through a "Balkan League " in the event of breakdown of power Turkey in Europe, with the subsequent integration of Greece and Montenegro, in October 1912 into action the armies of the League: Victorious Serbs in Kumanovo pushing the Adriatic, to Durazzo assisted by the Montenegrins, and also to the south by the Valley of the Vardar in Macedonia. The Greeks attacked from the south Macedonia won a decisive victory to take the port of Salonica on November 8, since so disorganized Turkish defense left in Albania and Macedonia. Bulgarians for their part were planted just 40 kilometers from Istanbul after defeating the Turks in the battle of Kirk-kilisse and Luleburgaz, but were stopped by a makeshift network of trenches before entering the big city Bosphorus. However, had taken much of Thrace and reached the Aegean Sea.


Since early 1913 the diplomacy and threats of intervention by the group of great powers imposed a reprimand reflected in the London conference. Austria-Hungary who had returned to Novi Pazar penetrate proposed the creation of an independent Albanian state isolated from the sea keep the Serbian state, while invoking the national principle, arguing that the Serbs had no right to control as it was a distinct population Albanians.

FOTO.OFICIALES BULGARIAN pose for the camera during the Siege of Adrianople (EDIRNE) IN THE FIRST BALKAN WAR.


The idea of \u200b\u200ban independent Albania stalled and was successively supported by Italy, Britain and Germany, making the typical balancing act, the May 30, 1913 was issued the peace treaty of London which enshrined the end of Turkish rule in Europe, now controlled only a narrow strip around the Sea of \u200b\u200bMarmara and its capital Istanbul (Constantinople) was a frontier town. A tough blow for the "Young Turks" in power, on the other hand, the treaty establishing the division of spoils, Serbia enlarged thanks to Kosovo, Bulgaria, with most of Thrace and Greece and Thessaloniki and southern Epirus. The fate of Macedonia, divided equally among the three partners in Sofia profudamente upset Fernando I and the Bulgarian government and that the claimed in its entirety because it hoped to rebuild the "Big Bulgaria" screened at the San Stefano treaty 45 years ago.

In a strategic pirouette War II began Balkan, Bulgaria attacked by surprise in June 1913 to his two former allies that had worked just a month ago, but their armies were repelled and then completely defeated in July by the opportunistic intervention against Turkey and Romania. Austria-Hungary considered intervening in the midst of this scramble against Romania and Serbia, and sought diplomatic support to Bulgaria, but was discouraged in the opposite direction by German Chancellor Bethman-Hollweg.

Against this background, Bulgaria had to resign themselves to sign treaties Bucharest and Istanbul , accepting the loss of Edirne (Adrianople) and Dobrudja Amen to give up Macedonia. There was a relative relaxation in the winter of 1913-14, when Greece and Serbia withdrew its forces outside the borders assigned to Albania after Italian and Austrian pressure.


MAP. BALKAN WAR II