Wednesday, October 24, 2007

Dvp Sr200p Multiregion

"science show", or: The Scam Kyoto Warming

"science show", or: The Kyoto Scam Warming



Just a study of Chinese scientists who predict a sharp cooling for next 20 (Zhen-Shan, L. and Xian, S, 2007), but this news hits the mainstream media: only global terror instilled by the latest report from the UN-IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) - by heating presumably because C02 flood our ears punished.

No one can prove that climate change due to anthropogenic effects. The UN is only based on guesswork and computer simulations, but that's not science, is a scientific simulation is politically tinged speculative money and beliefs.


TO BREATHE pollute more

climate change disinformation and propaganda manipulation that gives the UN are ubiquitous. The annual human C02 is 6000 million tonnes, which is at 1,500 because half is absorbed by vegetation and oceans and the other half comes from farming and ranching. Breathing annually emit about 2,500 million tonnes and there are 750,000 million total in the atmosphere (Essex & MacKitrick, 2003), making it impossible for the human C02 can produce climate change.

The C02 and water vapor (the largest emissions factor) act as plastic or glass in a greenhouse, trapping heat leaving the earth by solar radiation greenhouse infrarroja.El natural is good and gives prosperity as Arrenhius said, its discoverer and confirmed Budyko, another authority.

The temperature rise in a century has been 0, 6, and only half is due to C02 according to the experts of the UN (IPCC report 2001). The only daytime maximums have increased 0.2 degrees in a century (Esterling et al, 1997). The current C02 is 380 ppm (parts per million), an amount that we had in the Carboniferous without Bush and nothing happened. In the Cambrian we 7,000 ppm and at the time of the dinosaur-ments 3,000 and 6,000 ppm (Scotese, 2001, Berner 2001) and no contaminated or the average temperature then spent just 22 º C. We encourage our 50,000 ppm and no one dies. In addition, the measured C02 preindustrial bad as Wagner and Van Hoff reported, so the actual increase is still lower than that stipulated: only 40-50 ppm.

say that with 540 ppm coming catastrophe, but that we share and the large industrial cities and still alive. 70,000 years ago there was an increase of 16 ° C in Greenland (Dansagaar-Oeschger event 19) and nothing happened and no contaminated. How are we to have caused Disaster us for only half a degree (0.3 º C real C02) and 18 cm rise in sea level?. This is Science Fiction. Kyoto only this rebate.

Dr. William Ruddiman, University of Virginia, said that the C02 is good because it slows down the ice and says that the current warming started thousands of years. The C02 does not increase the temperature, as evidenced in the C02 40-70 up and the temperature fell 0.3 ° due to solar cycles (Murray Mitchell Jr., 1976).

thousand years ago used to grow grapes in the south of England in the so-called MWP: There was a warmup before the mini ice age of the Maunder Minimum in 1650, which is what will happen now with the minimum of 2020 Gleissberg as hysteria IPCC has no scientific basis. This shows that the current warming is not the highest in recent centuries: a logic swing, cyclical and natural, which anticipates a cooling phase, the opposite of what we sell.

Sea level has risen only 18 cm in a century according to the UN (6 cm real as Wadhams & Munk, 2003) and the cataclysm that tell the models that will happen in 100 years-if true-up of 55 or 88 ridiculous centimeters according to the IPCC. The UN asked suspiciously 200,000 million dollars annually to prevent the apocalypse.

The NERC, Institute of English that is lined with warming, calls dóalres 9 trillion. NERC from the Stern Review which proclaimed Blair, announcing a major disaster. But Nicholas Stern is interested source, a member of the UN, World Bank Vice President, in addition to the NERC has received 20 million pounds to save us from global warming.

Kyoto is a market that moves U.S. $ 200,000 million by 2012 and that Spain is going to cost 19,000 million euros, according to audit Price Waterhouse Coopers. We are less polluting and more NAMOS pay because of bad business that made Narbonne and Bacon. Unprovable assumptions behind the Kyoto such fine not CO2 from cars is mostly money, business and politics because now science is politicized and scientists live on government grants and institutions.


BULO THE CONSENSUS: 18,000 SKEPTICS

Most of the world's scientists reject the hypothesis that the C02 has warmed the atmosphere, 18,000 reject the so-called Oregon Petition, 1997 (seen here www.oism.org), pressure-loss by Frederick Seitz, a former member of the UN-IPCC there and former president National Academy of Sciences of the USA, who quit the IPCC, as the hurricane expert Dr. Landsea, by the corruption he encountered there.

Kyoto also strongly rejected the call Leipzig Declaration, 1995 signed up to the famous scientist Sir Fred Hoyle, creator of two of the most famous theories on the origin of the uni-verse and life (panspermia), who announced his colleague Chandra Wikramasinghe, astrophysical world authority, that we are approaching an impending ice age (Campos, Calor Glacial, 2005). Dr. Victor

Bokova, the AARI (Institute of Arctic and Antarctic Research), the world's leading and only predicted the tsunami of Indian advertising, based on the Weather Index Vanghenheim-Girs we approach an age of ice would start in 2010 peaking in 2090. (Campos, 2005).

In 2006 Dr. Kabhibullo Abdusamatov, head of the Russian Space Station (Russian NASA) who rejects the thesis of Kyoto, says exactly the same: "At 9 or 6 years will start a mini ice age." Many solar scientists as Solanky or Soon and Baliunas, Harvard University, make identical forecasts. Theodor

Landscheidt, the only hit with the arrival of El Niño, also warned in the 90 on a mini-ice age, as we approach the minimum Gleissberg 2030. Hence comes the cold waves that sweep across the world for three years. According to Suess solar cycle of 180 years, also plays cooling, since the Dalton minimum period nineteenth century has been exhausted. But the IPCC always ninguneo solar cycles.

Scientists predicting cooling while Kyoto critics are legion, heads-two Fred Singer, John MacKitrik, Steven MacIntyre, Frederick Seitz and Richard Lindzen, the most eminent meteorological go U.S.. Dr. Zbigniew Jaworoski, former chairman of UNSCEAR, United Nations Scientific Committee for the Effects of Atomic Radiation, says "Western civilization will be swept away by ice" (Campos, 2005).

Hundreds of experts from around the world consider the danger of glaciation scenario as Robert Essenhigh, the Oregon State University, who says he will arrive in 5 or 50 years, Robert Gagosian and William Curry of the world's leading Oceanographic Institute (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution), the Pentagon report in 2004, experts in the current Gulf and Bryden, Wadhams and Marotzke, English officials as Millán Millán and dancing ("The Day After Tomorrow could happen," he said), Peter Clark, Howard Conway, Gerald Dickens, Gerard Bond, John Gribbin, Laurence Hecht, Jack Sauers etc ...

say that the incompetent Bush or Exxon-Mobil paid to these scientists. but where is the campaign of those authors who completely silence the media? Calentólogos say and members of the IPCC, as Piltz and Pielke, who studies censure Bush, but is just the opposite: the IPCC who ruthlessly purges all dissent. Dr. Roy Spencer and many others criticize the IPCC Science and censor their studies anticalentamiento. (Bethell, 2006)


FUNDAMENTALISM MATHEMATICAL

Experts from the UN-IPCC are only 2,500 and all models, ie only based on computerized simulations made by computer to 100 years for counterfeit scare or graphic as the famous hockey stick of Mann and Bradley (members of the IPCC), where they removed me-dieval warming for the current look older. Nature had to apologize in 2004 for this chicanery. Most of the authors of the IPCC are bureaucrats and scientists, as Pachauri Qin lords organization, and all scientists in solar cycles and paleoclimate are censored, as all mentioned in this article.

The creator of the IPCC was Bert R. Bolin, a fan of computer simulations that made his career by speculating on human action on climate change, based on studies Roger Revelle, the Guru of Al Gore, a paranoid obsessed with the danger of C02, which is even very beneficial because it helps the growth of plants (Maier-Reimar, Hesselman, Climate Dynamics, 1987)

why Dr. Michael Crichton warns that carbon fundamentalism and mathematical State of Fear (2005) that would put a stamp on warming computer models as snuff packages such as:

- "SIMULATION BY COMPUTER, COULD BE WRONG AND NOT ACCOMPLISHED "

Specialists solar cycles are those who say that an ice age or cooling comes they have no place in the UN: Soon, Baliunas, Landscheidt, Jawarowski, Lindzen, Michaels, etc. .. or most of the Russians Abdusamatov, Kondratyev, Bokova Masnich, Bashkirtesev ... The Russian Academy of Sciences has rejected the thesis of the UN, because temperatures as -40 º last year etc. .. do not argue.

That consensus that there is a canard: so there is the same politicized corruption reports made by the UN on Iraq's weapons (Bethell, 2006). Turned out it was all a lie. Now is the same. The press draws on false and manipulated reports UN and gives the impression that there was consensus. Is that if only half a degree warming in a century is said to be natural, no more funds and the business of Kyoto where you buy and sell the C02 in a grotesque market of 200,000 million dollars until 2012. Reports of AIDS from UNAIDS are also exaggerated and manipulated. The corruption of the UN has been denounced by Eric Frattini in a book titled.


THE LIES OF POLES AND GLACIERS

So what is said there are a legion of scientists agree is absolutely false. There is a war between multinational renewable energy (which are the oil companies: they are not "hippies": British Petroleum, Shell, Sharp, Siemens, Acciona, Enron etc ...) and the cheap gas against coal to seize pie market. That is the origin of the phobia against C02 coal and electricity. The conferences of Al Gore, for example, pays action to promote renewable energy-solar wind. (See http://www.todosolar.com). Greenpeace is a shareholder in Shell.

Contrary to the daily crush us, Antarctica and Greenland is cold in general (Doran, 2002, Johanessen, 2005) although there are parts that are thawed natural causes, and most of glacial stable Ciara (Braithwaite, 2002) or grow, as the largest (Lambert, Logan, Naruse ...). Remember that the last two ice ages were caused by the melting of the Arctic, which cut the Gulf Stream, which warms the Northern Hemisphere.

The Aletsch Alpine retracted and in the nineteenth century and thaws Kilimanjaro to deforestation (Khas et al, 2004). West Himalayan glaciers are increasing, according Fowland (2006), who blames everything on the heating in a report commissioned and paid by the IPCC, which is a member, an example of the reports and conclusions of the UN, in which no informed person should believe.

By Luis Carlos Campos
English journalist,
Author of the book: Heat glacial

Source: www.mitosyfraudes.org

Posted by: Carlos A.
Ortiz Former Professor - Researcher
Faculty of Economics, U.Na.M, is

Friday, October 19, 2007

Whats The Difference Between Minohd And Ultra Hd

ozone holes of Fear - 2 º Part

by Roger Maduro and Ralf Schauerhammer * Translation by Eduardo Ferreyra *




by Roger Maduro and Ralf Schauerhammer Translation Eduardo Ferreyra

English Translation of book that 1992 provoked the wrath and fury of the international environmental corporation

Volcanoes can be the most dramatic source of atmospheric gases, but oceans are definitely the biggest source. Extensive studies on the annual flow of chlorine and sulfur in nature were made in the 50s and 60s for the most important atmospheric scientists from Sweden, Erik Eriksson. Among the many surprising discoveries made by Eriksson to examine the transport and exchange of gases in the atmosphere was the fact that annually circulated through the atmosphere 10 times more sulfur than that released by industrial activity. Until the appearance of the work of Eriksson, most scientists had assumed that all the pollution came from the man. Eriksson showed sulfur natural sources are vastly superior to industrial emission sources.

In a paper published in the journal Tellus, in April 1959, "Annual Circulation Chlorine and Sulfur in Nature," Eriksson was set carefully at the sources of atmospheric chlorine and calculated that the sea water contributes about 600 million tons of chlorine into the atmosphere annually, transported there by about 1000 million tons of sea salt particles. (The sea water containing NaCl, or sodium chloride, common table salt. These salt particles enter the air through evaporation of sea water released into the atmosphere by the action of the waves, spraying aerosols into the air.)

This means that seawater contributes 800 times more chlorine into the atmosphere, which is contained in the entire world production of CFCs . But the comparison Freon presumably the amount of chlorine released by CFCs is even more surprising: the seawater provides 80,000 times more chlorine than the alleged dissociation in the stratosphere of CFCs. The proponents of the theory of ozone destruction argue, of course, that not a single ounce of this chlorine reaches the stratosphere, because the rain drags him back to the surface. They do not bother to explain the origin of chlorine in the stratosphere had before CFCs were invented. Therefore, there is no reference to chlorine in the oceans in the apocalyptic works of ozone, although Eriksson et al provide evidence that, indeed, vast amounts of chlorine from the sea can be, and indeed reach the stratosphere.

For example, Eriksson was to determine rigorously, not only how much chlorine was produced by the oceans, but how much time remained in the atmosphere, what was happening with him and where it was finally deposited. This was an extremely question Eriksson critical, as there are large concentrations of salt surface in the world that are hundreds of miles of ocean. Where does the salt?

Studies indicate that large amounts of salt back into the sea after a short period of time, through dry deposition or rain, and large amounts of salt may remain suspended in the atmosphere for long periods of time. Eriksson reviewed studies show that the increased turbulence and convective cells over land can lead to air currents and ocean salt content up to greater heights. This is especially the case of the warm currents. Eriksson concluded:

"It is difficult to overestimate the significance of these findings and show that chlorine-rich air can be transported at high levels in the continents, thus passing over mountain barriers without loss of chlorine by washing . Once on the continent, mixing with colder air will cause the precipitation of water and salt from the sea from that stratum. The transport and subsequent accumulation of sea salt makes it easy to understand the formation of the Bonneville Salt Flats in Utah . [P. 397].

addition, languages \u200b\u200bhot air flowing from climatic disturbances such as thunderstorms are rich in chlorine. This is extremely important since the storms, especially hurricanes, carry huge amounts of air, chemicals and water vapor from the surface to the top of the troposphere and can penetrate and inject large amounts of air directly into the stratosphere There are many other compelling work to show that vast amounts of marine and other sources chlorine do reach into the stratosphere.

Three scientists from the National Center for Atmospheric Research, AC Delaney, JP and WH Sheldovsky Pollock published a paper in the edition of December 20, 1974, the Journal of Geophysical Research ("Stratospheric Aerosol: The Contribution from the troposphere) which documented the presence of chlorine and bromine in the stratosphere originated in the oceans, noting that in the stratosphere is much more chlorine and bromine that resulting from direct injection of particles of sea salt. Delaney et al, write that there are twice as chlorine "than might be expected to accompany the sodium, as the other component of the salt sea of \u200b\u200batmospheric aerosols, and bromine is present in an excess of about 200 times more. "They emit the hypothesis that the particles of salt, NaCl and NaBr, are destroyed in the lower troposphere and the gases released are then transported to the stratosphere where they recombine again to form particulates.

Delaney et al. talk about fact that chlorine must come from the sea, but they can not find a clear chemical pathway by which ions can dissociate and recombine, and the same is even more true for bromine. An interesting mechanism that they propose to carry chlorine and bromine to the stratosphere is "the folding of the stratosphere and on a smaller scale turbulent transfer between the troposphere and the stratosphere." It was not until several years after this study that other researchers established that there were many sources for chlorine, in addition to the salt in the oceans.

Exchange Processes
Troposphere-Stratosphere

It is clear that the volcanoes and the ocean sent massive amounts of chlorine and bromine in the atmosphere. The biggest scientific problem of the matter is, these gases reach the 10 or 16 miles high in the stratosphere, and if so, how are they transported?

As discussed in a work of Elmar R. Reiter, "Processes of troposphere-stratosphere exchange" (Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics) There are four basic mechanisms for moving aerosols and gases from the troposphere to the stratosphere: (1) seasonally adjusted average height of the tropopause, (2) large movements organized, large scale, through meridional circulation, ( 3) transport of vortex (vortex) on a large scale, mainly in the region of the "jet stream" and (4) transport to small and medium scale eddies through hurricanes and other storms that can penetrate the stratosphere and inject there large amounts of water vapor, hot air and tropospheric gases.

Here we see the third mechanism, the current jet. These currents play a critical role in determining the weather in the weather systems across the world, and yet they are the least understood atmospheric phenomenon. Each hemisphere has three jet streams: one in the subtropics, one in the midlatitudes and over the poles - which is only at certain times of year. Figure 1.3

CUT SECTION OF MASS AIR FLOW
from the stratosphere to troposphere,
NEAR THE JET STREAM

A three-dimensional view of the flow of air masses from the stratosphere to the troposphere near the jet stream. Isentropic surfaces are indicated by thin lines. Thick lines are used to indicate constant wind speeds, the front edges, and the tropopause.

Source: Adapted from Elmar R. Reiter, "Stratosphere Troposphere Exchange Processes Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 13, No. 4 (August 1975).

The basic point here is that the jet streams of air exchanges occur very intense, where air the troposphere is taken up and injected into the stratosphere, and vice versa. Figure 1.8 shows a cut in section of a jet stream, indicating the path of stratospheric air. The wind speed is higher in the center, sometimes exceeding 200 knots, and is weaker on the outside of the current vortex. Figure 1.4 is a bit more complicated, showing the cyclonic nature of the jet stream, an anticyclone beneath it, and how does a simultaneous injection of air from the troposphere into the stratosphere and vice versa.

Figure 1.5 is perhaps one of the clearest. Shows a continuous series of measurements of the troposphere-stratosphere interactions, conducted by Reiter Reinholt on Zugspitze mountain Germany's highest. (It should be noted that Reiter Reinholt is not related in any way with Elmar Reiter.)

can see how air masses entering the troposphere into the stratosphere several kilometers above the tropopause, the start date. Then a stratospheric intrusion breaks down through the tropopause and from the core of the jet stream there is an injection of stratospheric ozone-rich air to the surface of the earth. Figure 1.4


NATURE OF HURRICANE JET STREAM

lines short lines show the lines of vorticity in the cyclonic side of the jet stream, while the lines point-and-dash lines show the vorticity of the anticyclonic side. The gray band indicates stratospheric air moves down into the troposphere. The thick black line that crosses from left to right represents the tropospheric air upward through the jet stream toward the stratospheric

Source: Adapted from Ermar R. Reiterates "Stratosphere-Exchange Processes Troposf'era", Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 13, No. 4 (August 1975).

Shortly after this event, the troposphere, "bounces" and the opposite happens: the air in the troposphere makes its way through the tropopause and tropospheric air leads to a height of 20 kilometers, twice tropopause height. Later, another more intense stratospheric intrusion, where the jet stream sent back ozone-rich air to the surface of the Earth. (An aside on this subject: There ozone in the stratosphere is ozone in the Earth's surface and there is ozone in the middle of the two.

According to the standard environmentalist dogma, ozone in the stratosphere is "good" because it filters out harmful ultraviolet rays mislabeled, while ozone in the troposphere is "bad" because it is the main component of urban smog. However, as Figure 1.5 and many other scientific studies show, the stratospheric ozone injections are very common, and many scientists believe are the main source of tropospheric ozone. In fact, it is likely that the stratospheric ozone down to the surface of the Earth, causing a "smog alert" that can be wrongly blame the car).

In fact, ground-level ozone is paying some dishes broken by others. Although toxic levels have been determined by the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), is beneficial as a germicide always present, useful for combating infections resulting from small cuts or grazes. In fact, it encourages the installation of ozone generators in hospitals to control the spread of disease among patients and to help heal the wounds from accidents or surgery. Chlorine

Biomass Burning

Until the late '70s, the amount of gas supplied to the atmosphere by biomass burning and forest fires are considered minimal, but careful measurements of forest fires since then indicate that this is an important source of gas for global atmospheric chemistry. The burning of biomass may actually contribute to the atmosphere than carbon dioxide all the industrial activity of man in the world. In a 1989 interview with an author, scientist Alberto Setzer, the Brazilian Institute for Space Studies calculated that in 1987 the burnings in the Amazon rain forest had freed more than 540 million tons of carbon dioxide. The American scientist Richard Houghton in a conversation with the authors in 1988, advanced a higher figure based on an estimate which included not only to CO, from the burning of forests, but the amount released by the newly exposed soil: 4 billion tons. This means that only the burning of the Amazon - which is less than half of all the world's forest area is burned by man and subject to primitive agriculture, produces almost as much CO, as any release of CO was attributed to industrial activities: 5 billion tons. Another

gas released by burning biomass includes chlorine, the villain of the hole in the ozone layer in the form of CH3Cl (or methyl chloride). According to one of the first papers on the subject ("Biomass Burning as a Source Atmospheric Gases CO, H2, N2O, NO, CH3, Cl, and COS, "Nature, Nov. 15, 1979, pp 253-256), 420,000 tons of chlorine contained in CH., C1 were released in 1979 by burning biomass, the authors of the work, Paul Crutzen, Leroy Heidt, Joseph Krasnec, Walter Pollock and Wolfgang Seiler, warn, however, that their estimates may be too low.

Since this work of Crutzen et al. appeared originally published in Nature, the rate of global deforestation, biomass burning and Slash-and-burn has increased exponentially - the result of the austerity policies imposed on developing countries and the failure of agencies international finance such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for the transfer of advanced technologies. Therefore no surprise that more accurate satellite surveys show that global deforestation and burning of tropical forests are at least 10 times more than what was expressed by Crutzen et al. This means that biomass burning is releasing at least 4.2 million tons of chlorine into the atmosphere.

biogenic This chlorine generated, according to Crutzen et al., Can pose a serious threat to the ozone layer because it dissociates into the stratosphere in the same chlorine atoms produced by the recited dissociation of CFCs. One of the most interesting points of this work is that it represents another attempt by Paul Crutzen to prove that man is destroying their nest. Crutzen, one of the first proponents of ozone depletion in the early '70s, in recent years has been rather silent on the subject of "chlorine-de-la-biomass", perhaps to avoid drawing attention to the fact that there are other sources of chlorine to the atmosphere, in addition to man-made CFCs.

In a lecture given in March 1989 in Williamsburg, Virginia, on biomass burning, scientists documented the extent biomass burning around the world, not just those caused by human activity, but also contributed by the forest fires of Mother Nature. While world attention was riveted on large forest fires in Yellowstone in 1989, across the world, a vast area of \u200b\u200bSiberian forest in northern China and were burning; million hectares of forests were burned to the ground. It is a fact, natural forest fires are recorded as most of the biomass burned in the Northern Hemisphere.

The vastness of the fires of Mother Nature and her forests, however, does not lower the great tragedy happens in the Third World, when nations are forced to slash and burn rainforests simply to produce energy for cooking and heating. Over 60% of global deforestation is the result of cutting trees for firewood. Most countries in Central Africa obtained more than 90% of its energy from biomass burning.

Niger is a country that used to export timber, must now import millions of tons of fuel wood, for international lending institutions will prohibit the import of petroleum and coal, energy sources much more efficient. In fact, the majority of deforestation is the direct result of environmental policies that prevent reaching the advanced technology sector in development. If attempts to build nuclear plants in the Third World had not been blocked by environmentalists, most of the ecological disasters that are happening today in those countries could have been avoided. If the Africans could use tractors and fertilizers, for example, would not have to burn each year 5,000 square kilometers of savannah and plant to plant.

Returning to the issue of chlorine villain: At present, more than 4.5 million tons of chlorine gas are made annually by biomass burning mostly in the tropics. If we consider the recent information provided by the fire of Yellowstone National Park and others, reviewed in the March 1990 conference mentioned above, the amount of gases from forest fires in northern latitudes can contribute as much as burning biomass in developing countries. Consequently, the estimate for the chlorine produced by burning biomass is approximately double to 8.4 million tonnes. This represents. at least 11 times more chlorine than the entire global production of CFCs in a whole year (750,000 tons) and 1,120 times the amount of chlorine released by the alleged allegedly dissociation of CFCs.

Even this figure. 8.4 million tonnes, may prove to be a gross understatement. In his 1979 paper, Crutzen et al. warn that they did not include in its calculations for the gases could be released from the heating of the organic matter in the soil cover, "or of 40-80 x 10" gC (4 to 8 billion tons of carbon) matter being exposed to fire, but abandoned later as dead biomass, without burning above the ground. "(p. 2o6). They add that" the organic matter in the soil cover is particularly rich in nutrients and can make important contributions to the cycle of atmospheric trace gases and nutrients. "(P. 256).

Another point that Crutzen and his coauthors emphasize is the fact that emissions occur in tropical regions active atmosphere. The two largest of these regions are above the Amazon rain forest and Indonesia archipelago. They are known as the "stratospheric sources" of the world, because of the huge amount of water vapor and gases into the stratosphere by very violent convective storms in the region.

This is of great importance for study transport of chlorine and bromine into the stratosphere, because these rainforests are where you place the greatest amount of biomass burning, and the most active volcanic area is located in the area of \u200b\u200bthe "stratospheric fountain" of Indonesia, providing immediate transport to the stratosphere for biogenic and volcanic gases. The behavior of these dynamic regions, the Amazon rainforest, was first studied in depth during a joint air expedition conducted by NASA and the Brazilian space agency, INPE, 1985 and 1987. The results of the scientific expedition called Experiment Lindera Atmospheric Layer (ABLE), were summarized by Robert J. McNeal, head of the Division of Earth Sciences and Applications at NASA, during a testimony before the U.S. Senate on September 20, 1988:

"In the Amazon there is a mechanism that transports gas between the boundary layer of the planet and the free troposphere where they can come in patterns of large-scale circulation. All too often down deep convective storms of considerable volume, and an essential move continuously around the Amazon basin. Such storms download material from very high in the atmosphere, up to and including the stratosphere, ozone is a source (and] also raised material from the top of the forest cover to the top of the troposphere. ... The intensity and frequency of storms coupled essentially vertically to the surface and the troposphere in the Amazon region. "

These violent storms have enormous power. McNeal says that" individual convective storms carrying 200 megatons of air per hour, of which 3 megatons are water vapor releasing 100,000 megawatts energy into the atmosphere. "This is just a storm, on average, worldwide about 44,000 thunderstorms occur daily, mostly in the tropics, producing a total of more than 8 million of electric shock.

The widespread destruction of tropical forests as a result of deliberate policies that restrict the technological development will have consequences far greater imbalance in the global climate, the phantom threat of CFCs and other pollutants produced by man. As McNeal warned in his testimony:

E! replacement wetlands forests or pastures, most likely cause great impact on this huge oven, with the consequent large effect on rootstocks atmospheric circulation and, consequently, climate. The evapotranspiration and rain will fall. You can reduce the amount of latent heat transported to temperate and polar latitudes, and these regions may experience a cooler climate as a result. "
Algae vs.
.

CFC Other major suppliers of chlorine and bromine in the atmosphere . In 1981, an expedition led by atmospheric scientist Hanwant Singh, went on board Coast Guard Polar from Long Beach, California, to Valparaiso, Chile, taking air samples and surface water. Singh and colleagues found that sources in the ocean were emitting large amounts of methyl halides. Their study, published in the Journal of Geophysical Research (April 20, 1988) states: "It is determined for the eastern Pacific the average flows, sea air, for chloride, bromide and methyl iodide."

then explains that these organic compounds "are important transport of chlorine, bromine and iodide in the global atmosphere." Singh et al. reach the surprising conclusion that its actions along the eastern Pacific Ocean show a dominant source of methyl halides, and that "this is big enough to be blamed for the whole load tropospheric of these species. "(P. 8689, emphasis added).

Singh and his colleagues calculated that the oceanic source of these compounds released more than 5 million tons of methyl chloride and 800,000 tonnes of methyl bromide to atmosphere. It should be noted, moreover, that although his reading of methyl bromide averaged 23 parts per billion, measured only 0.7 parts per billion of halons. However, halons are the chemical fire extinguisher is being banned in U.S. because it contains bromine , a substance that the faction has labeled ozone destruction as much worse than chlorine.

In recent years, scientists in favor of ozone depletion have questioned the idea that ocean sources can produce such vast amounts of chlorine and bromine - amounts that by themselves without the help of sea salt and volcanoes, are much larger than the chlorine and bromine in CFCs and halons. Without any evidence, the faction of ozone depletion argues that man-made substances have to be the source of these methyl halides and no natural sources, because their computer models and say it . These models, however, consistent with the observed and verified.

The controversy between the models and the information was conclusively clarified with the publication in Science, July 13, 1990, the study conducted by Anne Marie and Lowell P. Wuosmaa Hager, Department of Biochemistry at the University of Illinois. They show that marine biomass is responsible for injecting a huge amount of chlorine and bromine in the atmosphere, and how it happens.

"halohydrocarbon The most abundant species in the upper atmosphere is methyl chloride, and is widely believed that the biological synthesis is largely responsible to sustain a global emission rate estimated at 5 million tons of methyl chloride per year. It is well documented synthesis of methyl chloride by fungal colonies of putrefaction of wood, and there were isolated studies reporting in vivo synthesis of methyl halides by marine macroalgae and phytoplankton. " [p. 160 ]

Wuosmaa The original contribution to this field and Hager is that they managed to synthesize in the laboratory and for the first time, one of the halohydrocarbon: the metiltribromuro. Furthermore, they discovered an enzyme that can synthesize the methyl halides. The enzyme is widely present in nature, including mushrooms, red seaweed and "frosty." The authors conclude that "although the production of 5 million tons per year represent a prodigious rate of methyl chloride, this figure may well be understood in terms of the large terrestrial biomass can contribute to their training." [P. 162].

One of the most interesting and Hager Wuosmaa work is his assertion about the biogenic sources of methyl halides may be much higher than previously calculated, both in the oceans and on land. Singh's team performed measurements in open areas of the Pacific Ocean, but the highest density of biomass located near the coast. This means that the oceanic biomass production may be greater when more extensive measurements are made. Added to this, and Hager Wuosmaa say the role of land plants in the production of methyl halides has been totally ignored. For example, they write:

"The presence of the enzyme [which can synthesize methyl halides] in the" frosty ", a terrestrial plant that grows in abundance in California coastal soils, is an interesting observation that perhaps notes the need for an inspection of the activity of the methyl halide transferase in other species juicy that grow in environments rich in salt. Also noteworthy is the fact that the plant "Frosty" has a worldwide distribution. " [p, 162]

Dental Cream" destroy the ozone layer?

The other main ingredient is fluoride CFC ( F), which is also an alleged murderer of ozone and a super "greenhouse gas". (The fluoride in toothpaste and drinking water supply is not under threat but that threat is not inconceivable given the sentence imposed on CFCs).

Fluoride, like chlorine, is an abundant natural gas. The explosion of Tambora in 1815 introduced to air a minimum of 120 million tons of fluorine. At present production rates, this represents the equivalent of 486 years of global CFC production. Moreover, the passive emission of gases from volcanoes may be about 6 million tons annually, which is 24 times larger than the amount of fluoride in the global production of CFCs (that is 248,600 tons per year). See Table 1.2.

Three scientists, Robert B. Symonds, William I. Rose and Mark Reed, published a paper in the journal Nature (August 4, 1988) where the contribution to investigate the atmosphere of fluorine-containing volcanic gases and chlorine. After evaluating the evidence the authors draw conclusions contrary to the statements of Ozone Trends Panel. The Panel suggests that "photolysis of anthropogenic halocarbons in the stratosphere is the only major source of atmospheric HF (hydrogen fluoride)," they write on page 418.

However, "This study supports other work on the volcanoes that emit natural gas also emit significant amounts of HF, some of which are directly injected into the stratosphere. Therefore, the volcanoes should be considered as an important source of tropospheric and stratospheric HF. " Another source of fluoride in the atmosphere is sodium fluoride oceans. However, this source has not been fully investigated.

In an article written in November 1980 the journal Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics, Richard Cadle said that apart from the volcano, "very little is known about most of the other sources of hydrogen fluoride" [p. 749]. estimates that 44,000 tons of fluorine are issued annually into the atmosphere by evaporation ocean, but it up to this figure by extrapolating from the information available for sodium chloride. There have been no systematic measurements, and the annual emission rate of fluoride can easily be ten to one hundred times larger. Table 1.2

SOURCES OF ATMOSPHERIC FLUORIDE
(annual tons)

6,044,000
Volcanoes 6. 000,000
Seawater
44,000
Total natural sources
Fluorine on CFCs
248,000
Fluorine
theoretically released by the alleged breach of the CFC 2480
Who Did It?

In all the apocalyptic stories is always lurking villain. According to F. Sherwood Rowland and other theorists, the scene of the destruction of ozone, the villain is the chlorine in CFCs. However, according to what we have seen in this chapter, Mother Nature produces the oceans and volcanoes, thousands of times more chlorine than CFCs. Why ignore Rowland and his co-thinkers such huge amounts of chlorine in nature? Is it because they are ignorant - or because they want to keep the public uninformed? As we shall see later, this kind of lying-by-omission is characteristic of an unparalleled scientific scandal in history. References

  • Steven R. Brantley, ed., 1990. "The Eruption of Volcano Redoute, A! aska, December 14, 1989 - August 31, 1990." U.S. Geological Service Circular i061.
  • Richard D. Cadle, 1980. "A Comparison of Volcanic with Other Trace Gas Fluxes of Atmospheric Constituents," Review of Geophysics and Space Physics, vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 746-752
  • Cassadeval TJ et al., 1990. "Emissions of Sulfur Dioxide Rates and Carbon Dioxide from Redoute Volcano, Alaska, During The 1989-1990 Eruptions." Paper presented at the Fall Meeting of the American Geophysical Union, San Francisco, CA (Dec 3-7).
  • Chapman Conference, 1990. "Global Biomass Burning: Atmospheric, Climatic, and Biospheric Implications," Proceedings. Williamsburg, Va.. (March 19-23)
  • P.J. Crutzen, L. Heidt, J. Krasnec, W. Pollock y W. Seiler, 1979. "Biomass Burning as a Source of Atmospheric Gases CO, H2, N2, NO, CH3CI, y COS, "Nature (Nov. 15), pp. 253-256 A.C.
  • Delaney, J.P. Sheldovsky y W.H. Pollock, 1974. "Stratopspheric Aerosol: the Contribution from the Troposphere," Journal of Geophysical Research, (Dec. 20), vol. 79, No. 86, pp. 5646-5650.
  • J.D. Devine, H. Sigurson y A.N. Davis, 1984. "Estimates of Sulphur ans Chlorine Yield to the Atmosphere From Volcanic Eruptions and Potencial Climatic Effects," Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 89, No. B7, pp. 6809-6825.
  • S.D. Doiron, G.J.S, Bluth, C.C. Schnetzler, A.J. Krueger y L.S. Walter, 1991. "Transport of Cerro Hudson SO, Clouds," EOS (Nov. 5) pp. 481-491.
  • E. Eriksson, 1959. "The Yearly Circulation of Chloride and Sulfur in Nature; Meteorological, Geochemical and Pedalogical Impiications," Tellus, vol. 2, No, 4 (Nov.), pp. 375-408
  • · ·T.M. Gerlach, H.R. Westrich y T.J. Cassadeval, 1990. "High Sulfur and Chlorine Magma During the 1989-1990 Eruption of Redout Volcano, Alaska," Trabajo presentado en la reunión de Otoño de la American Geophysical Union, San Francisco, Ca. (Dic. 8-7).
  • B.M. Goodman, 1984. "The Ciimatic Impact of Volcanic Activity." Tesis Doctoral, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisc.
  • D. A. Johnston, 1980. 'Volcanic Contribution of Chlorine to the Stratosphere: More Significant to Ozone Than Previously Estimated?", Science, vol. 209 (Jul. 25), pp. 491-493
  • W.W. Kellog, et al., 1972. "The Sulfur Cycle," Science, vol. 175 (Feb. 11), pp. 587-596.
  • J.P. Kotra, D.L. Finnegan y W.H. Zoller, 1983. "El Chichón: Composition of Plume Gases and ParticIes," Science (Dic, 2), pp. 1018-1021.
  • P.R. Kyle, K. Meeker y D. Finnegan, 1990, "Emission Rates of Sulfur Dioxide, Trace Gases and Metals from Mt. Erebus, Antarctica," Geophysiccsl Research Letters, vol. 17, (Nov.), pp. 2125-2128.
  • B.G. Levi, 1988. "Ozone Depletion at the Poles: The Hole Story Emerges," Physics Today, vol. 41 (July), pp. 17-21.
  • · ·W.G. Mankin y M.T. Coffey, 1984. "Increased Stratospheric Hydrogen Chloride in the EI Chichón Cloud," Science, vol. 226 (Oct. 12), pp. 170-172.
  • L. McClelland, D. Lescinsky y M. Slaboda, 1991. Bulletin of the Global Volcanism Network, May, June, July and August).
  • · ·R.J. McNeal, 1988. "Statement for Senate Hearings on the Implications of Global Climate Change" Presentado Sept. 20, pp, 800 ff de los registros de audiencias.
  • R. Monatersky, 1991. "Pinatubo's Impact Spreads Around the Giobe," Science News (Aug. 81), p. 182.
  • · ·N.C. Nash, 1991. "Volcano Ash is Smothering Vast Areas of Argentina." The New York Times, (Oct. 21).
  • E.R. Reiter, 1975. "Stratospheric-Tropospheric Exchange Processes," Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics, vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 459-474.
  • Reinholt Reiter, 1988. "Modification of the Stratospheric Ozone Profile After Acute Solar Events," Weather and Climate Responses to Solar Variations, ed. Billy M. McCormac. Boulder, Co.: Colorado Associated University Press,
  • W.I. Rose, R.L. Chuan y P.R, Kyle, 1985. "Rate of Sulfur Dioxide Emission from Erebus Volcano, Antarctica, December 1983," Nature, Vol. 316 (Aug. 22), pp. 710-712.
  • C.C. Schmetzler et al., 1990. "Satellite Measurements of Sulfur dioxide from Redouté the Eruptions of December, 1989. "Paper presented at the Fall Meeting of the American Geophysical Union, San Francisco, CA (Dec. 3-7)
  • A. Setzer, 1989." Will Be The Rain Forest Gone in 10 to 15 Years. "(interview), 21st Century Scienee & Technology (Ene-Feb.), pp. 28-85.
  • HB Singh, LJ Salas and RE Stiles, 1983." Methyl Halides in and Over the Eastern Pacific (40 ° N-32 ° S), "Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 88, No. C6 (April 1920), pp. 3684-3690.
  • RB Symonds, WI Rose and MH Reed, 1988. "Contribution of CI- and F-bearing Gases to the Atmosphere by Volcanoes," Nature, vol. 334 (Aug. 4) pp. 415-418.
  • D.C. Woods, R.L. Chuan y W.I. Rose, 1985. "Halite Particles injected into the Stratosphere by the 1982 El Chichón Eruption," Science, vol. 280 (Oct. 11), pp. 170-172.
  • A.M. Wuosmaa L.P. Hager, 1990. "Methyl Chloride Transferasa: A Carbocation Route for Biosynthesis of Halometabolites," Science, vol. 249 (July, 18), pp. 160-162.
por Roger Maduro y Ralf Schauerhammer*
Traducción de Eduardo Ferreyra*
Source: Myths and Frauds

Sunday, October 7, 2007

Male Waxing Madison, Wi

ozone holes of Fear - 1 Part

by Roger Maduro and Ralf Schauerhammer * Translation by Eduardo Ferreyra *

Chapter 1: Natural Sources of chlorine are greater than the CFC

English translation of the book that in 1992 drew the ire and the anger of the international environmental corporation
Introduction

"The sky is falling!, the sky is falling! "Chicken Pepe screams when an acorn falls on his head. Pepe Chicken Alarm spreads among Juanita Hen, Peter Peacock and others accompanying him to advise the king. On the way to find Titus Fox, taught them to believe that the shortest way to the king, led them to his cave - and straight to your dinner pot. Thus ends the original version of the story for children.

If any of the characters in this story would have Chicken Pepe asked if he had any scientific evidence even your alarm, the fox would not have achieved such a great feast.

This book is intended those who want to make this important question: Where is the evidence? Is the sky really falling? Are the CFC (chloro fluoro carbons) actually destroying the ozone layer? - Or are the victims of a sophisticated Tito Zorro?

This is precisely the situation the authors faced in 1988. One of the authors (Roger Maduro), then a believer in the theory of ozone destruction was gathering evidence to write an article demonstrating that the theory of global warming was a scientific fraud. During an interview with Reid Bryson, head of the Institute Environmental Studies in Madison, Wisconsin, the author

surprised when told he did not pay attention to the theory of ozone depletion in Antarctica because there was a volcano that injected more chlorine into the atmosphere than could the whole annual production of CFCs of all the earth, Bryson said that if the chlorine was accused of causing destruction of the ozone hole in Antarctica, then this volcano was the real culprit, not CFCs.

This information put a1 author, trained geologist, a crusade. After some phone calls to the most outstanding U.S. volcanologists confirmed what Bryson said Mount Erebus, Antarctica, pumps more than 1000 tons per day of chlorine into the air. This means that the Erebus accumulates in the atmosphere more chlorine in a week that all production of CFCs would do in a year.

This book is the result of that quest for scientific truth about ozone. Material presented questioned How most reader Basic assumptions we extensively referred scientists and posted work demonstrating Why Theory's ozone destruction scientific fraud.

Most of the 1st information may be confirmed by a visit to the nearest library that has scientific publications. As readers will notice, the new variant on the story of Pepe Chicken, is now Tito Pepe Chicken and Zorro seem to be working together to convince people that the sky is falling on them.

The giant chemical corporations, candidates to make billions of dollars to the 1st sale of the replacements for the now banned CFCs, are working with the environmental movement - which has already raised millions of dollars in fear of the destruction layer ozone. Groups U.S. environmentalists can finance the promotion of fraud and the destruction of ozone, by more than 500 million dollars a year it receives from major charitable foundations managed by the U.S. financial elite - Rockefeller, Ford, MacArthur and other foundations.

But money is not the only reason behind the fraud of ozone. Behind the drive to ban CFC - and to stop cooling - is the Malthusian idea that the world needs fewer people. that the world needs fewer people. The cost to the public caused by the ban on CFCs and other beneficial gases will be much larger than the immense gain of those who sell replacements for these chemicals. The next time the headlines announced: "The sky is falling!" people should ask "cui bono?" - Who benefits?, And start looking for the acorns that fall.

What are CFCs?

To understand the importance of the CFC should have a look at its history. The advent of electricity at the end of the 19th century dramatically changed the lifestyle of people. Parallel to the widespread use of electricity and scientific discoveries, technological and medical that occurred to late, there was a rapid increase in the lifetime of American and European populations. Provided electricity energy, not only for lighting but for entirely new technologies such as cooling of food to family homes, industry and agriculture. Food

previously spoiled by heat, were now available at any time of year and could be transported under refrigeration. Electricity made it possible for ordinary citizens could have refrigerators in their homes.

natural sources of chlorine are greater than the CFC

The theory of ozone depletion does not claim that CFCs destroy ozone, says a chlorine atom detached from the dissociation of CFCs destroying the ozone. If it were true that the chlorine in CFC could sweep away the ozone layer, then Mother Nature will appear to be suicidal. Chlorine is one of the most abundant chemicals in the atmosphere.

Natural sources of atmospheric chlorine Pygmies to become extremely small amounts of chlorine that could eventually come from the release of all CFCs from Earth. Based on scientific evidence, if indeed the chlorine was a threat to the ozone layer, then governments should put a lid on volcanoes and prohibit to evaporate seawater.

annual CFC production is currently estimated at about 1,100,000 tons, which includes 750,000 tons of chlorine. Compare this with natural sources of chlorine gas, as shown in Table 1.1 and Figure 1.1.

More than 600 million tons of chlorine are released each year into the atmosphere by evaporation of sea water containing salt (sodium chloride, NaCl). Although most of the chlorine is washed by the rains, large amounts of it reach the stratosphere through of the pumping action of storms, hurricanes, typhoons and other surges.

volcanoes that emit gases into the atmosphere passively injected more than 36 million tons of chlorine in ordinary years, when there are no volcanic eruptions. Large eruptions emit few million to hundreds of millions of tons of chlorine. More importantly, violent eruptions inject gases and particles directly into the stratosphere.


Table 1.1 Sources of atmospheric chlorine
(million tonnes per year)

5.0 There
Seawater
600.0
Volcanoes
36.0
Burning biomass
8.4
Oceanic Biota
Chlorine in CFCs
0.75
Chlorine
theoretically released by the alleged disociaciónde
the CFC molecules
0.0075

8.4 million tons of chlorine gas produced by burning biomass, largely as a result of primitive farming methods, such as cut-and-burn, and lack of modern energy in developing countries is.

that are measured ocean biota, including algae, kelp and plankton emits more than 5 million tons of methyl chloride into the atmosphere, and large amounts of the biotic source of chlorine have been measured very high in the stratosphere Recent studies indicate that land plants may also contribute large amounts of methyl chloride into the atmosphere.

addition, unknown quantities of chlorine entering the Earth from outer space as a result of the rains of meteorites and cosmic dust that burn up the atmosphere.

These comparisons are much more amazing when you make between the amounts of chlorine released by CFCs supposedly and natural. According to the theory, only about 1% of annual production is dissociated in the stratosphere (The reason is that the CFC, being chemically inert, have a lifespan of more than 100 years in the atmosphere). Consequently, production of CFCs a year would help most, with 7,500 tons of chlorine into the atmosphere. In a more orthodox English, chlorine contribution made by the CFC is just one-tenth of 1% of the chlorine produced by nature. This, of course, rests on the assumption that the CFC are dissociated in the stratosphere, an assumption for which there is no observational evidence.


SOURCES OF ATMOSPHERIC CHLORINE (million tonnes)

Chlorine of the Antarctic Ozone Hole

One of the unique documented facts from the stories of fear of ozone, the concentrations of active forms of chlorine in the region of the so-called Antarctic ozone hole from 100 to 1,000 times higher than at the same level in adjacent areas. Therefore - conclude the propagandists - the CFC are coming to Antarctica in huge quantities and are being dissociated by ultraviolet rays and releasing the chlorine atom murderer drilling a hole in the ozone layer.

East Antarctica chlorine from CFCs only, say the propagandists of the hole, using this as the final proof that the theory is correct Rowland and Molina. Ignored theorists of ozone depletion is the fact that less than 10 miles upwind of the observation station at McMurdo Sound, Antarctica, where the chlorine concentration measurements are taken, there is a volcano - Mount Erebus - began an active cycle of eruptions in 1972.


Bill Rose / Michigan Technological University
guilty of issuing daily 1,000 tons of chlorine into the atmosphere: Mount Erebus in Antarctica, located just 10 miles upwind of McMurdo Sound Station, where measurements are made ozone.

Unlike other volcanoes, Erebus erupts no and then goes for long periods of inactivity. Instead of a cauldron of lava from 2 to 8 kilometers deep inside the volcanic cone of Erebus boiler is on the surface, which means the volcano is erupting constantly. By observations made in 1988 by William Rose volcanologist at Michigan Technological University, work published in the journal Nature, has estimated that the Erebus emits more than 1,000 tons per day of chlorine into the atmosphere. This is more than 370,000 tons of chlorine, which by itself accounts for nearly half of production CFC annual worldwide (about 750,000 tons.)

Mount Erebus emissions are much more dramatic when compared with the amount of chlorine allegedly resulting from the dissociation of CFCs released into the atmosphere (7,500 ton.) On their own, the Erebus injected into the atmosphere 50 times more chlorine than the entire annual CFC production worldwide. (See Figure 1.2).

short, chlorine measured in Antarctica should be no mystery. Mount Erebus is constantly emitting a thick cloud of chlorine and other volcanic gases, the wind picks up and carries a paltry 10 miles to McMurdo Sound. There, the scientists measured with sophisticated equipment from the ground, and with complicated equipment sent balloons to heaven. The balloons are passed directly through the volcanic cloud. The most amazing of all is that no scientists report mentioned the existence of this volcano! The public has been led to believe that the existence of chlorine in Antarctica comes from the CFC.

CHLORINE RELEASE OF MT.
EREBUS COMPARED WITH CHLORINE RELEASED BY DISSOCIATION
OF CFC
(tonnes)

Figure 1.2

El Monte Erebus es aún de más interés en la historia del ozono. Está ubicado en el área de la fuerte corriente de chorro estratosférica polar, o "jet stream". Con su gran altura - 4.300 metros - una enorme porción de los cientos de miles de toneladas de cloro expelidas por el Erebus son tomadas y enviadas viento abajo por la corriente de chorro, que transporta al cloro miles de kilómetros a medida que circula por el polo. Esta veloz corriente de chorro, con vientos de hasta 400 km por meses del año, creando las condiciones dinámicas para el ciclo natural que conduce al adelgazamiento de la capa de ozono sobre la Antártida, durante un período de 80 a 60 días del año - The so-called ozone hole. (This issue will be studied in more depth in Chapter 5).

Chlorine many active volcanoes has an atmospheric lifetime of a few weeks to several months because the chlorine is dissolved in the water and returns to earth with rain. The atmosphere of Antarctica, however, is extremely dry, so that compounds of Erebus have a life span longer, before being precipitated to the ground. There is no evidence that chlorine measured in McMurdo comes from the dissociation of CFCs.

Sunlight reaches Antarctica for only six months a year, and during the other six months is very dark. During the height of summer, the sun is just a few degrees above horizon. In fact, ultraviolet radiation that reaches the Antarctic stratosphere during most of the year is very weak because it must travel great distances horizontally through the atmosphere. Therefore, do not have the energy to destroy the molecular bond strengths of CFCs in these levels.

The Role of the Volcanoes and the World Chlorine

The Case of Mount Erebus leads us to consider the broad issue of global flows of chlorine. How much chlorine is injected by volcanoes into the atmosphere, and how this manages to reach the stratosphere? During the '70s, the standard estimate for the emissions of chlorine from volcanoes were 7.6 million tons annually, according to estimates by the volcanologist OG Bartels, published in 1972. Some volcanologists claimed that volcanoes emit much greater quantities, but there was no concrete evidence of this.

The problem of measuring the emission of the volcanoes is twofold: first, the chlorine in the atmosphere is, like many other gases, extremely difficult to measure. Second, close to a volcano to measure what is coming out of it, is a matter extremely dangerous. Therefore, all estimates of the flow of gases from volcanoes are only "educated guesses."

One of the procedures used to measure the amount of chlorine and other gases emitted by volcanoes, is to estimate the chemical composition of hot magma before an eruption and then examine the chemical composition of volcanic rocks after the lava has cooled . The scientists then calculated the difference between chemical content and multiply it by the lava that was estimated from the volcano, the result is the estimate of the gases released by the volcano. Another procedure

is to analyze the content of gas samples obtained directly from the smoke plume. This is so hard to measure, in the case of chlorine, which scientists first measured the sulfur and then calculate the amount of chlorine as a relationship of sulfur emissions.

The first systematic measurements of chlorine in volcanic eruptions were made in the 70's by a volcanologist at the U.S. Geological Survey, David A. Johnston. In a paper published in Science magazine, July 1980 (Chlorine Volcanic Contributions to the Stratosphere: More Significant to the ozone than previously estimated? "), Johnston says that the true amounts of chlorine released by volcanoes can be 20 to 40 times larger than previously estimated and vastly superior to all the chlorine content of the CFC. Even these estimates may be too low, and Johnston says

"... if the rate of release of gases beneath the surface fast compared to the rate of magma ascent and eruption, then the gas may have escaped previous magma explosions had not erupted until later or perhaps not made at all. In this case, the total injections of HCl into the atmosphere and stratosphere may have been much higher than these estimates [pg. 492] "

Specifically, says Johnston, a single volcanic eruption in 1976 put more chlorine in the atmosphere that the total amount of chlorine in all CFCs produced in the world in 1976.

Until the publication of work Johnston, the emission of chlorine from volcanoes was estimated assuming that the magma contains from 0.02 to 0.025 percent (by weight) of chlorine before the eruption, and that this amount was emitted during the eruption. In his careful measurements Johnston found that the percentage of chlorine in the magma was in fact 20 to 40 times higher - 0.5 to 1.0 percent.

In discussing the effect of volcanoes on the ozone layer and climate, Johnston says that large eruptions can have a lasting impact on stratospheric ozone. Cites the example of the eruption of the Bishop Tuff, Long Valley Caldera, California, about 700,000 years ago. This rash may be injected into the stratosphere some 289 million tons of HC1, he says, the equivalent of about 570 times the total production of chlorine in CFC manufactured in 1975, around the world. " Johnston says "Clearly, the natural sources of chlorine can be very significant compared with man-made sources. "


Sea water releases more than 600 million tons of chlorine into the atmosphere each year through evaporation. most of the chlorine is washed by rain, but huge amounts of chlorine still reach the stratosphere.

Johnston sought to measure actual emissions of volcanoes from around the world but, unfortunately, died at his observation post during the eruption of Mount St. Helens in the state of Washington, in 1980.

What is the global flow of chlorine from volcanoes'? Using the analysis more detailed chlorine by David Johnston and multiplying previous estimates (7.6 million ton) produces an estimate indicates that the annual emission of chlorine from volcanoes can be between 152 and 812 million tons per year. As the actual quantities of direct action are unknown, the world's leading volcanologists conservatively estimate that annual emissions of chlorine from volcanoes are 36 million tons in the years that no major volcanic eruptions. No matter which figure is used, the basic fact remains is that the chlorine released by Mother Nature, through volcanoes, ridicules amounts of chlorine in the CFC, of \u200b\u200bhuman origin.

Moreover, when violent eruptions occur, more chlorine is injected directly into the stratosphere One such volcano was Krakatoa, near the island of Java in the Indian Ocean. Through a series of eruptions in 1883, the Krakatoa sent a shock wave that traveled seven times around the earth, and covered an area of \u200b\u200bhundreds of thousands of square miles with ash. The giant waves created by the explosion drowned more than 30,000 people in Java. Using very conservative estimates, volcanologists J. Devine, H. Sigurdson, AN Davis and S. Self (1984) estimated the Krakatoa spat over 8.6 million tons of chlorine into the atmosphere. Other volcanologists believe that the amount should have been ten times higher.

But even the mighty Krakatoa is small compared to other volcano in the Sunda volcanic arc, Indonesia - Tambora. When the Tambora exploded in 1815, about 30 cubic kilometers of its top was sprayed by injecting massive amounts of debris and ashes directly into the stratosphere The volcanic cloud reduced the sunlight reaching the Earth's surface, lowering temperatures. In northern latitudes, the years of 1815 and 1816 became known as the "year without summer, and snowed in the U.S. in the middle of what is normally the hottest part of the year.

The Tambora deposited a layer of ash is almost a meter-thickness up to 70 miles away, and released a minimum of 211 million tons of chlorine gas into the atmosphere. At the current rate of production of CFCs will lead humanity some 318 years to put chlorine in the atmosphere much like he did the drum. The explosive nature of eruptions Krakatau and Tambora ensured that a large portion of chlorine to be sent directly to the stratosphere.

So if the theory of destruction ozone by chlorine were true, such a catastrophic release of chlorine in 1815 should be completely swept the ozone layer, flooding the earth with ultraviolet rays, known as "causing skin cancers." Each and every one of the men, women and children on Earth should have suffered skin cancer. However, there is no record in the first part of the 19th century of mass extinctions of human, animal or plant caused by skin cancer or other effects of ultraviolet radiation.

The eruption of El Chichon, a volcano in the Yucatan Peninsula in Mexico, is an indicator that large increases in stratospheric chlorine do not have a significant effect on the ozone layer. In March and April 1982, major eruptions occurred at El Chichon, which injected large amounts of gas and particles in the lower stratosphere. A coherent volcanic cloud was established very soon in a band around the Earth. Several months after the eruption, several planes flew through the volcanic plume by measuring the concentrations of gases in the stratosphere. William G.

Mankin and MT Coffey, National Center for Atmospheric Research published the results of some of these flights in the October 12 edition 1984 in the journal Science. Reported that El Chichon was introduced directly into the stratosphere more than 40,000 tons of hydrogen chloride (HC1), equivalent "to about 9% of the burden of HCI obal g!" (p. 171). In the broad band which extended the volcanic cloud, the amounts of stratospheric HC1 increased 40% over previous values.

Richard Stolarski and Ralph Cicerone, two early proponents of the fear of ozone depletion, had originally suggested in 1973 that direct injection of chlorine in the stratosphere by volcanoes could result in substantial destruction ozone. In 1974, however, they rejected this theory to launch the new fear that the chlorine boosters Space Taxi going to wipe out the ozone layer. In the Science article mentioned above, Manchon and Coffin notice this change of course and concluded that its own findings "should lead to a re-evaluation of the role that volcanoes on stratospheric chlorine chemistry." (p. 172).

On December 14, 1984, Mount Redoubt, Alaska, erupted and ash cloud disrupted air traffic, forcing the cancellation of hundreds of flights. A 747 jumbo jet flying to 9,000 meters high with 250 people aboard, lost all four engines and nearly crashed before the pilots managed to relight the engines and land safely in Anchorage.

The volcano had a series of 24 eruptions between 14 December 1989 and April 21, 1990. Each eruption created huge clouds of ash, many of whom are believed to penetrate into the stratosphere by putting the volcanic debris high into the atmosphere. Although it was impossible to measure volcanic gas emissions until March 20, 1990 (because of the pervasive darkness in Alaska), some estimates were made based on the clouds of ash and sulfuric acid which were distributed by the U.S.: the volcano sent more than 880,000 air tons of sulfur dioxide (SO,,) and an estimated 1 million tons of chlorine gas. Although there were more explosive eruptions since April 1990, Mt Redoubt is still active, releasing 300 to 500 tons of carbon dioxide and about 330-500 tons of chlorine per day.

These figures explosive gas eruptions are extremely conservative (the original estimates were in the order of 2 million tons of sulfur dioxide, only to the eruption of December), but they serve to show that Mother Nature is the worst polluters. The amount of chlorine blown into the atmosphere by the volcano, is significantly larger than the entire annual production of CFCs in the world. As noted above, the gas cloud from the volcano rose fully to the tropopause in the most explosive eruptions, and into the stratosphere several times, an amount that is uncertain because of the darkness.

However, observations of the eruption of Mt Redoubt indicated that a significant amount of volcanic chlorine was injected into the atmosphere of the Northern Hemisphere in late 1989 and early 1990. Volcanic chlorine, therefore, reached the ozone layer and, hence, the predictions of the theory of Rowland / Molina should have become reality in the form of massive destruction of ozone in northern latitudes, accompanied by an increase in lethal ultraviolet radiation to the inhabitants of -at least - Canada, New York, and New England in general. There was no increase in ultraviolet radiation reaching the surface of these areas. And there was the theory of ozone destruction.

However, all these pale in comparison volcanic eruptions in a recent series that began on November 17 1990 with the eruption of Mt Unzen in Japan, followed by the eruption of Mt Pinatubo in the Philippines in April 1991. One of the largest eruptions of the century, the Mount Pinatubo began as a series of earthquakes, small columns of smoke and loud explosions that led to the eruption of June 15-16, which lasted 15 hours. The volcanic plume reached more than 30 miles high, nearly half of the stratosphere, creating a huge cloud of ash that was still giving back to Earth in 1992.

Another major volcanic eruption that also went into the stratosphere was the Hudson volcano Chile, between 12 and 15 August 1991. In a curious way, the eruption of the Hudson was hardly mentioned in the media. Although it occurred on a desolate region of the Andes, caused massive environmental damage, putting more than one cubic kilometer of ash in the Patagonia region of Argentina. The deposits of more than 15 inches thick desert became almost a third of Argentina, wiping out crops and killing more than 1 million sheep.


Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines, April 1991:
a major volcanic eruptions century.

In a paper published in the EOS of November 5, 1991, Scott Doiron and his colleagues estimated that the Hudson was released into the atmosphere more than 2.75 million tons of sulfur dioxide. Their estimates for the eruption of Pinatubo were almost ten times larger: 20 million tons of SO, though the figures for chlorine are not yet available [1992], both volcanoes, magmas were rich in chlorine and fluorine, which indicates that hundreds of millions of tons of chlorine and fluorine were injected directly into the stratosphere by these volcanoes.

Moreover, the eruption Mt Hudson created a volcanic plume over 2 million square kilometers traveled directly to the Antarctic. Loaded with chlorine and fluorine, the cloud arrived just in time to move around the polar vortex, at the critical moment when the annual ozone hole was forming: in the press did not mention a word about this cloud.

As a result of the eruption of Pinatubo was a catastrophic flood of new predictions, some scientists warning that the volcano would cause a reduction of 15% of the ozone layer for this winter. The villain of this story was now dioxide sulfur. In 1990, Guy Brasseur, director of the division of chemistry of the atmosphere at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, advanced a new theory of ozone destruction. According to this new challenge in the competition for the destruction of ozone, sulfur dioxide particles of the volcano will suffer a series of complex chemical reactions with other molecules, at the end of which the molecules of stratospheric chlorine reservoirs - supposedly from CFCs - would be destroyed, freeing the chlorine to engullesen vast amounts of ozone. It was never mentioned

by Brasseur the fact that it carrying the volcanic plume of sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere was carrying a quantity of chlorine molecules far greater - Natural chlorine molecules. Also omitted the fact that each year there are large volcanic eruptions that cause ozone destruction - nothing but a natural phenomenon, quite common.

Volcanoes and Climate

now return to the chlorine that reaches the stratosphere through or smaller eruptions of volcanoes that emit gases passively. This is an important issue because, as noted before, even in years without major volcanic eruptions, volcanoes emit more than 86 million tons of chlorine into the atmosphere - 4800 times more chlorine than theoretically supposed released by dissociation of the CPC in the stratosphere.

proponents of the theory of ozone destruction despise the natural chlorine arguing that not a single ounce reaches the stratosphere. The profound scientific question here is not just how much of this chlorine reaches the stratosphere but also how volcanoes play a big role in the modulation of climate by changing properties "optical" in the atmosphere and therefore the amount of light solar can reach Earth.

Benjamin Franklin was the first to propose that volcanoes play an important role in climate. In a paper read before the Philosophical Society of Manchester, England on December 22, 1784, Franklin reported that he had observed reduction in the intensity of sunlight on the surface of the earth during the winter of 1783, and had developed the hypothesis the eruption of Laki in Iceland crater at the beginning of summer, had created a "haze" that was blocking the sunlight. Franklin postulated that the severe winter of 1788 -84 in the eastern U.S. and Western Europe, had been the result of the reduction in solar intensity, preventing the occurrence of the normal heating of the earth's crust during the summer.

Franklin's hypothesis was that the "haze" high altitude had been formed by the "solid" volcanic dust ejected by the explosive force of the volcano in Iceland. He said the volume and height reached by the ejected dust was in direct proportion to the explosive force of the volcano, the vertical structure of wind at the time, and location of the rash. As Franklin exhibited this work in the 18th century, scientists have assumed that only the largest and most violent explosive eruptions could cause a measurable impact on climate. As in the past two decades have made it possible to obtain samples directly from the stratosphere these assumptions have been refuted.

One of the debunkers is JD Devine, Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, USA. His work in 1984 - marking a milestone in science - published in the Journal of Geophysical Research, suggests that sulfate aerosols have a much greater climate impact than the "dust" volcanic. Along with his co-authors H. Sigurdson and AN Davis found a very strong correlation between temperature changes on the surface of the Earth and the amount of sulfur released by volcanic eruptions that found no correlation with other materials ejected by volcanic explosions. This study included detailed examinations of the presence of gases had been released were estimated by several large volcanoes, including chlorine.

One of the most important work of Devine is that it is necessary to have explosive eruptions to put all this material, including chlorine in the stratosphere to affect climate. Devine's theory and his colleagues argued that the thermal structure of the atmosphere over a large lava field may be disturbed by the heat released by the volcano's surface, so that some of the released gases can rise to the stratosphere - a phenomenon they describe as "analogous to the initiation of free convection a fluid on a plate that is heated from below. " [P. 6321].

In 1984, another theory was presented by Brian Goodman, Center for Climatic Research at the University of Wisconsin. His doctoral thesis is a review of the history of the case and suggests that low-intensity volcanic activity has an impact on the climate through sources with diffuse volcanic gas. It also suggests that climate records reflect the existence of harmonic cycles of volcanic activity, influenced by solar and lunar tides. Before 1970, says Goodman, is commonly thought that only the solid particles of volcanic dust, called "tephra" has-ta could reach the stratosphere via violent eruptions. Therefore, pre-1970 studies were fixed only in the most violent eruptions to determine the impact on climate. However, he says,

"... a more moderate active eruption can produce the same total amount of offsetting emissions low emission rate with longer duration of activity. In this situation, the gaseous emissions are not directly injected into the stratosphere but are often sent to the upper troposphere where they can stay for several weeks. This allows some fraction of the original eruption are transported into the stratosphere indirectly through one of several exchange processes between the troposphere and the stratosphere. "(P. 14)

by Roger Maduro and Ralf
Schauerhammer * Translation by Eduardo Ferreyra *
Source: Myths and Scams